-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(feat): Update notebooks for new leiden defaults #77
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Current issues:
Overall issues are the number of warnings, which is quite high without suppression. Is this expected, and if so, how were they repressed in the past for building the docs? |
So there are a few different strains here:
Points 2. and 3. will be the blockers here for 1.10. 1. can come later. The focus for now will just be on these notebooks. |
…py-tutorials into ig/leiden_changes
I have no idea why they were displayed without a stack trace in old renderings of the notebooks. Maybe some manual setting somewhere? By the way, those are not the warnings that will make a sphinx build fail when running sphinx in CI or with |
@flying-sheep I understand, I was just curious. I would be in favor of silencing them if you'd be ok with that. |
Depends: If there’s instances of warnings coming
Otherwise:
Should be avoided with
Should probably fixed? I don‘t think this is a good idea basically anywhere, one can almost always be more specific warnings.filterwarnings('ignore') |
…py-tutorials into ig/leiden_changes
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB flying-sheep commented on 2024-02-26T16:08:01Z So the cluster order changed because you did ilan-gold commented on 2024-02-26T16:21:36Z Yes! |
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB flying-sheep commented on 2024-02-26T16:08:02Z The former “B” cluster is now labelled “CD8 T”, plus some other changes … this should be fixed! ilan-gold commented on 2024-02-26T16:23:15Z Huh, I am not sure what happened here. The local diff was correct. It's possible something didn't push.
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB flying-sheep commented on 2024-02-26T16:08:03Z Line #4. warnings.filterwarnings('ignore') This seems to be left from when we thought the display version still had them. Please remove this line and rerun. |
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB flying-sheep commented on 2024-02-26T16:08:05Z very weird that this warning is still there, is that an anndata bug? ilan-gold commented on 2024-02-26T17:30:49Z Nope, this cell was not run
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The filterwarnings needs to be removed and the cluster order fixed.
Regarding the weird “obsm setting made view into actual” thing I don‘t know what’s going on.
Yes! View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
Huh, I am not sure what happened here. The local diff was correct. It's possible something didn't push.
View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
Nope, this cell was not run
View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
See scverse/scanpy#2815 for implementation prompting the changes. The changes here generally reflect the reordering of labels. It does not look like results changed in a meaningful way, so changes should be minimal in that sense.