Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Covalent's GoldRush to list of ecosystem indexers #132

Closed

Conversation

harishraisinghani
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change?

Add new content around the GoldRush developer toolkit available for builders on Sei.

Describe the changes to the documentation

Added GoldRush to the list of ecosystem-providers/indexers as well as a GoldRush quick start guide, targeted to developers.

@harishraisinghani harishraisinghani requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2024 00:06
@harishraisinghani harishraisinghani changed the title Covalent goldrush Add Covalent's GoldRush to list of ecosystem indexers Sep 6, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexander-sei alexander-sei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, several things have to be fixed before we can merge here:

  • The link to the GoldRush API](https://goldrush.dev/docs/api/?utm_source=sei&utm_medium=partner-docs) does not work and points to a 404.
  • Please remove the changes made to indexers.mdx . We made an updated version of the indexers page that does not use manual entries. Just remove the changes of indexes.mdx all together please.
  • If possible, could you please make the first section about Goldrush a bit shorter and a bit more neutral ? We would like to keep a more neutral tone to our docs, eventhough we love the solutions of colvalent for Sei. 👍

@harishraisinghani harishraisinghani closed this by deleting the head repository Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants