Add design proposal with diagrams for feedback #1
Conversation
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Phase 0 | ||
| - [x] Reach out to developers, PO/Ms, and SEs to understand the pain points and use this feedback to develop tooling that will feature in the project |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Where can I find the summary of the discussions? don't need the full discussion, just the results/insights
README.md
Outdated
| # Phase 0 | ||
| - [x] Reach out to developers, PO/Ms, and SEs to understand the pain points and use this feedback to develop tooling that will feature in the project | ||
|
|
||
| - [x] Define an MVP that will provide immediate value and a running backlog |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same question - where is the definition of the MVP?
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| The following represnts the use case diagram for this project. | ||
|
|
||
|  |
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Open questions: | ||
|
|
||
| - I provided the Use Case Diagram above but do not feel that those (`Get Container Data` and `Extract Logs/Env`) are use cases as these items depend on Troubleshooting to operate correctly. Are there more use cases besides troubleshooting? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a question for the PO/PM (in this case it is you and the field)
Troubleshooting can be a use case if you can define the flow... you probably can extract "child" use cases from it but get container data is a technical functionality and not a use case (I want to get logs/specific details, not just arbitrary data)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what might be a child use case?
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - I provided the Use Case Diagram above but do not feel that those (`Get Container Data` and `Extract Logs/Env`) are use cases as these items depend on Troubleshooting to operate correctly. Are there more use cases besides troubleshooting? | ||
|
|
||
| - In the Troubleshooting class should I use a factory method that chooses between 2 different classes (DAP/Conjur) that implements the same interface (ConjurEnv)? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You tell me :)
in any case I would start with the HLD first to better understand the system.
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - In the Troubleshooting class should I use a factory method that chooses between 2 different classes (DAP/Conjur) that implements the same interface (ConjurEnv)? | ||
|
|
||
| - What language to write this project in? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
English ;) (A.K.A - what language you feel the project has the most chances to be successful?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thinking TS b/c I want to use Angular for the UI. I found this wrapper to help bootstrap some Docker processes https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-docker-api
sigalsax
force-pushed
the
design-proposal
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e5102cc to
e51218b
Compare
sigalsax
force-pushed
the
design-proposal
branch
2 times, most recently
from
739ceb6 to
cfc1b95
Compare
sigalsax
force-pushed
the
design-proposal
branch
from
cfc1b95 to
fbcd702
Compare
sigalsax
force-pushed
the
design-proposal
branch
from
fbcd702 to
7f718c1
Compare
README.md
Outdated
| - What language to write this project in? | ||
|
|
||
| - Angular/Typescript, Node Docker API: https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-docker-api |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, just added a detail description of the backend
sigalsax
force-pushed
the
design-proposal
branch
from
d3fb070 to
2a3a55f
Compare
This PR adds the design for the project as well as diagrams for visibility and feedback