[Merged by Bors] - Switch default slasher backend to LMDB #4360
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaelsproul
added
work-in-progress
|
WIP, I still need to update CI, docs, and add some tests |
michaelsproul
force-pushed
the
lmdb-default
branch
from
9fa4030 to
ca3c950
Compare
2 tasks
michaelsproul
added
ready-for-review
paulhauner
approved these changes
Jun 1, 2023
michaelsproul
added
waiting-on-author
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <[email protected]>
michaelsproul
added
ready-for-review
|
Fixed up an unused import in the slasher tests, should be ready to merge after that |
|
It looks like the Windows tests are running out of disk :( |
paulhauner
added
waiting-on-author
|
Ah, #2342 strikes again. Will fix. |
2 tasks
This was referenced Jun 3, 2023
michaelsproul
added
ready-for-review
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2023
## Issue Addressed Closes #4354 Closes #3987 Replaces #4305, #4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2023
## Issue Addressed Closes #4354 Closes #3987 Replaces #4305, #4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
|
bors r- |
|
Canceled. |
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2023
## Issue Addressed Closes #4354 Closes #3987 Replaces #4305, #4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
|
Pull request successfully merged into unstable. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.
|
bors
bot
changed the title
ghost
pushed a commit
to oone-world/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
## Issue Addressed Closes sigp#4354 Closes sigp#3987 Replaces sigp#4305, sigp#4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed Closes sigp#4354 Closes sigp#3987 Replaces sigp#4305, sigp#4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed Closes sigp#4354 Closes sigp#3987 Replaces sigp#4305, sigp#4283 ## Proposed Changes This switches the default slasher backend _back_ to LMDB. If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference. The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue Addressed
Closes #4354
Closes #3987
Replaces #4305, #4283
Proposed Changes
This switches the default slasher backend back to LMDB.
If an MDBX database exists and the MDBX backend is enabled then MDBX will continue to be used. Our release binaries and Docker images will continue to include MDBX for as long as it is practical, so users of these should not notice any difference.
The main benefit is to users compiling from source and devs running tests. These users no longer have to struggle to compile MDBX and deal with the compatibility issues that arises. Similarly, devs don't need to worry about toggling feature flags in tests or risk forgetting to run the slasher tests due to backend issues.