Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ignore me #1

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ignore me #1

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

silverbullet233
Copy link
Owner

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 force-pushed the temp_table branch 3 times, most recently from 7a0b469 to bac0a39 Compare March 25, 2024 13:33
@silverbullet233
support temporary table
c1402f7 
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
@silverbullet233
fix
f7eed07 
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
@silverbullet233
fix
6dc33bf 
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
@silverbullet233
fix
7859a30 
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
silverbullet233 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
@stdpain
[BugFix] Fix BE crash when schema scan rpc failed (StarRocks#51889)
b2a4c8a 
## Why I'm doing:

in StarRocks#49318 add a start interface for chunksource. but not check return status.

## What I'm doing:

```
*** Aborted at 1728909404 (unix time) try "date -d @1728909404" if you are using GNU date ***
PC: @          0x6bbdd8b starrocks::SchemaVariablesScanner::fill_chunk(std::shared_ptr<starrocks::Chunk>*)
*** SIGSEGV (@0x28) received by PID 1854307 (TID 0x7f0b1bbff640) from PID 40; stack trace: ***
    @     0x7f0cb7d89ee8 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x99ee7)
    @          0x8f2bb29 google::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)
    @     0x7f0cb7d32520 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4251f)
    @          0x6bbdd8b starrocks::SchemaVariablesScanner::fill_chunk(std::shared_ptr<starrocks::Chunk>*)
    @          0x6bbdf4c starrocks::SchemaVariablesScanner::get_next(std::shared_ptr<starrocks::Chunk>*, bool*)
    @          0x6bb8d39 starrocks::pipeline::SchemaChunkSource::_read_chunk(starrocks::RuntimeState*, std::shared_ptr<starrocks::Chunk>*)
    @          0x4dd429f starrocks::pipeline::ChunkSource::buffer_next_batch_chunks_blocking(starrocks::RuntimeState*, unsigned long, starrocks::workgroup::WorkGroup const*)
    @          0x4d1967f auto starrocks::pipeline::ScanOperator::_trigger_next_scan(starrocks::RuntimeState*, int)::{lambda(auto:1&)#1}::operator()<starrocks::workgroup::YieldContext>(starrocks::workgroup::YieldContext&) const [clone .constprop.0]
    @          0x4663b9e starrocks::workgroup::ScanExecutor::worker_thread()
    @          0x7bb93b2 starrocks::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread()
    @          0x7bb16a9 starrocks::Thread::supervise_thread(void*)
    @     0x7f0cb7d84ac3 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x94ac2)
    @     0x7f0cb7e16850 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x12684f)
```

Signed-off-by: stdpain <[email protected]>
silverbullet233 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
@qingzhongli
[BugFix] Fix BFD initialization error on aarch64 (StarRocks#54372)
699b630 
## Why I'm doing:
BFD initialization error on aarch64:
```
[root@starrocks be]# uname -a
Linux starrocks 4.19.90-2107.6.0.0192.8.oe1.bclinux.aarch64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 21 09:23:05 CST 2023 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
[root@starrocks be]# ./bin/start_be.sh --daemon
[root@starrocks be]# tail log/be.WARNING
E20241217 09:49:19.948438 70369568784448 bfd_parser.cpp:107] set default target to elf64-x86-64 failed.
[root@starrocks be]#
```
## What I'm doing:

Fix BFD initialization error on aarch64.

Signed-off-by: qingzhongli <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
PROTO-REVIEW title needs [type]
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@silverbullet233