Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve creating a new block in super block #13568

Closed
TCOTC opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Improve creating a new block in super block #13568

TCOTC opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor

TCOTC commented Dec 21, 2024

继续完善 #10696

目前在列表后回车没有创建超级块:

video.webm
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jan 2, 2025

目前的交互应该没有问题,回车一次的话续写列表,不续写列表直接再回车的话才创建超级块。

@88250 88250 closed this as completed Jan 2, 2025
@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Jan 2, 2025

不续写列表直接再回车的话才创建超级块。

就是说这一步没有创建超级块

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jan 2, 2025

image

用这个超级块没有问题吧?

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Jan 2, 2025

没看懂。我的意思是在这个列表块的末尾新建段落块的时候,这两个块要自动合并垂直布局超级块。

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jan 2, 2025

我觉得自动合并到这个外层的横排的超级块里面才合理啊,因为列表本来也属于这个超级快。

@TCOTC TCOTC changed the title 在列表后回车自动创建超级块 Improve creating a new block by pressing Enter in a super block Jan 2, 2025
@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Jan 2, 2025

#10696 改了逻辑

刚刚发现非段落块都有这个问题,按 Enter 没有创建超级块。以及包括段落块在内的所有块,按 起始/末尾插入块 都没有创建超级块

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Jan 2, 2025

@Vanessa219

Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2025
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 self-assigned this Jan 3, 2025
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 changed the title Improve creating a new block by pressing Enter in a super block Improve creating a new block in super block Jan 3, 2025
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 added this to the 3.1.19 milestone Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants