Use StringBuilder instead of String concat for startup code #1293
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Unfortunately the JDK's indyfied String concatenation has a slight performance penalty at startup, so for code we know will always be run at startup, let's not pay that unnecessary price With this change we force javac to use the StringBuilder strategy
radcortez
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unfortunately the JDK's indyfied String concatenation has a slight performance penalty at startup, so for code we know will always be run at startup, let's not pay that unnecessary price
With this change we force
javacto use the StringBuilder strategyReplaces: #1292