-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve readme #247
Improve readme #247
Conversation
Thanks @Samuwhale, I think it's turning in the right direction. I still think the README reads a little bit on the sluggish side, but I think it's also good to wait on @vankesteren to see his perspective. I'm trying to think in which order I would want the information to be presented. I think it also depends a bit on which perspective you take (data provider or researcher). I'm taking the perspective of a researcher, also because I think they probably need the most help/attraction to get them started.
|
This aims to solve #241.
I have rewritten and scrapped a lot, adding links to the docs where information has been removed.
Please let me know if this is too concise, or if it could be even shorter.
I am still doubting about the 'feature' list, and what features to add or remove - or the wording on specific features. So feel free to give input on that section.