Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[workflow] Use automerge_scan instead of automerge for correct commit message. #17669

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

liushilongbuaa
Copy link
Contributor

@liushilongbuaa liushilongbuaa commented Jan 4, 2024

Why I did it

automerge and automerge_scan have different behavior when merging PRs.
automerge may left some PRs unmerged. So, use automerge_scan instead.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only): 26361240

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@liushilongbuaa liushilongbuaa marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2024 08:29
@liushilongbuaa liushilongbuaa changed the title [workflow] Use automerge_scan instead of automerge for correct commit… [workflow] Use automerge_scan instead of automerge for correct commit message. Jan 4, 2024
@liushilongbuaa liushilongbuaa marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2024 03:15
@liushilongbuaa liushilongbuaa marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2024 11:05
@xumia
Copy link
Collaborator

xumia commented Jan 8, 2024

@liushilongbuaa , could you please add the description of the PR? Thanks.

Copy link
Collaborator

@xumia xumia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@xumia xumia merged commit 1c3bf41 into sonic-net:master Jan 9, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants