Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip condition to skip SNMP IPv6 test case in 202211 branch. #9856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

SuvarnaMeenakshi
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

#9630 was added skip IPv6 related SNMP test cases in 202211 branch.
But the condition checks for branch name instead of release.
This is causing PR checker to fail as the branch name in PR checker is the PR number and not 202211

How did you do it?

Change condition to look for 202211 in release and not branch.

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Copy link
Contributor

@ZhaohuiS ZhaohuiS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SuvarnaMeenakshi SuvarnaMeenakshi merged commit c1f8c80 into sonic-net:master Sep 6, 2023
AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…et#9856)

What is the motivation for this PR?
sonic-net#9630 was added skip IPv6 related SNMP test cases in 202211 branch.
But the condition checks for branch name instead of release.
This is causing PR checker to fail as the branch name in PR checker is the PR number and not 202211

How did you do it?
Change condition to look for 202211 in release and not branch.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants