pin stdatamodels to new release

[zacharyburnett]

This PR pins stdatamodels to 1.0.0

Checklist for maintainers

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 77.93% // Head: 77.94% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (944d689) compared to base (3f7dcc1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 944d689 differs from pull request most recent head bb2e2a7. Consider uploading reports for the commit bb2e2a7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7465      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.93%   77.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         455      455              
  Lines       36957    36977      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits        28801    28823      +22     
+ Misses       8156     8154       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	77.94% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 171b3b7
unit	50.43% <ø> (+0.94%)	⬆️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jwst/assign_wcs/miri.py	90.47% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/assign_wcs/util.py	83.86% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/assign_wcs/nircam.py	91.30% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/assign_wcs/niriss.py	76.70% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/wavecorr/wavecorr.py	90.35% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/assign_wcs/nirspec.py	94.02% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/cube_build/ifu_cube.py	91.57% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/msaflagopen/msaflag_open.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/cube_build/cube_internal_cal.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
jwst/lib/set_telescope_pointing.py	85.69% <0.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
... and 2 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[hbushouse]

Given that the stdatamodels 1.0.0 release is available, shall we go ahead and "undraft" this PR and merge it? Or are you waiting for some other step in the chain of events before doing that?

[zacharyburnett]

Given that the stdatamodels 1.0.0 release is available, shall we go ahead and "undraft" this PR and merge it? Or are you waiting for some other step in the chain of events before doing that?

I was waiting for stdatamodels 1.1.0 with new PRs, but that can have a new pin. I'll go ahead and merge this one