omit data files from coverage tests

[zacharyburnett]

Resolves JP-3166

This PR addresses the following warnings in coverage tests:

2023-04-03 10:15:22,990 - stpipe - WARNING - /data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/miniconda/envs/tmp_env0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/coverage/report.py:113: CoverageWarning: Couldn't parse '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_fflat_0017.rmap': No source for code: '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_fflat_0017.rmap'. (couldnt-parse)
  coverage._warn(msg, slug="couldnt-parse")

2023-04-03 10:15:22,990 - stpipe - WARNING - /data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/miniconda/envs/tmp_env0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/coverage/report.py:113: CoverageWarning: Couldn't parse '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_flat_0015.rmap': No source for code: '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_flat_0015.rmap'. (couldnt-parse)
  coverage._warn(msg, slug="couldnt-parse")

2023-04-03 10:15:22,990 - stpipe - WARNING - /data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/miniconda/envs/tmp_env0/lib/python3.9/site-packages/coverage/report.py:113: CoverageWarning: Couldn't parse '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_fore_0024.rmap': No source for code: '/data1/jenkins/workspace/RT/JWST/clone/test_outputs/popen-gw11/test_nirspec_missing_msa_fail0/jwst_nirspec_fore_0024.rmap'. (couldnt-parse)
  coverage._warn(msg, slug="couldnt-parse")

Checklist for maintainers

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[zacharyburnett]

@hbushouse are there any other file types that come to mind to be omitted?

[hbushouse]

@hbushouse are there any other file types that come to mind to be omitted?

None that I can see at this time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (275eb0c) 77.69% compared to head (4ab2af8) 77.69%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7523   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.69%   77.69%           
=======================================
  Files         452      452           
  Lines       36211    36211           
=======================================
  Hits        28133    28133           
  Misses       8078     8078           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	77.69% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 275eb0c

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.