JP-2928: Update NIRCam image moving target regression test data

[melanieclarke]

Partially addresses JP-2928

Update NIRCam image moving target test to use in-flight data.

The data are a subset of the regression test data set identified by the NIRCam team. I modified the association file to use only the 5 nrcblong input files, for speed.

Tasks

• request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
• add a build milestone, i.e. Build 11.3 (use the latest build if not sure)
• Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
  • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
  • update or add relevant tests
  • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
    • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
      • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
• if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly

news fragment change types...

• changes/<PR#>.general.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
• changes/<PR#>.docs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.datamodels.rst
• changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst
• changes/<PR#>.fits_generator.rst
• changes/<PR#>.set_telescope_pointing.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pipeline.rst

stage 1

• changes/<PR#>.group_scale.rst
• changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst
• changes/<PR#>.emicorr.rst
• changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ipc.rst
• changes/<PR#>.firstframe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.lastframe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.reset.rst
• changes/<PR#>.superbias.rst
• changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst
• changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst
• changes/<PR#>.rscd.rst
• changes/<PR#>.persistence.rst
• changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst
• changes/<PR#>.charge_migration.rst
• changes/<PR#>.jump.rst
• changes/<PR#>.clean_flicker_noise.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst
• changes/<PR#>.gain_scale.rst

stage 2

• changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.badpix_selfcal.rst
• changes/<PR#>.msaflagopen.rst
• changes/<PR#>.nsclean.rst
• changes/<PR#>.imprint.rst
• changes/<PR#>.background.rst
• changes/<PR#>.extract_2d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.master_background.rst
• changes/<PR#>.wavecorr.rst
• changes/<PR#>.srctype.rst
• changes/<PR#>.straylight.rst
• changes/<PR#>.wfss_contam.rst
• changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst
• changes/<PR#>.fringe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pathloss.rst
• changes/<PR#>.barshadow.rst
• changes/<PR#>.photom.rst
• changes/<PR#>.pixel_replace.rst
• changes/<PR#>.resample_spec.rst
• changes/<PR#>.residual_fringe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.cube_build.rst
• changes/<PR#>.extract_1d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.resample.rst

stage 3

• changes/<PR#>.assign_mtwcs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.mrs_imatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst
• changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.exp_to_source.rst
• changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst
• changes/<PR#>.tso_photometry.rst
• changes/<PR#>.stack_refs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.align_refs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.klip.rst
• changes/<PR#>.spectral_leak.rst
• changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst
• changes/<PR#>.combine_1d.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ami.rst

other

• changes/<PR#>.wfs_combine.rst
• changes/<PR#>.white_light.rst
• changes/<PR#>.cube_skymatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.engdb_tools.rst
• changes/<PR#>.guider_cds.rst

[melanieclarke]

Regression tests with locally generated truth files:
https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/11238460863

Differences between the data generated on my system (Mac) and the GA run are at a comparable level to diffs for the existing data set, and appear in the WHT column only.

I will okify the GA product, but I can also expand the tolerance, so the test can pass on both systems. It looks like similar things are done for tests on resampled products elsewhere. For example:

jwst/jwst/regtest/test_nircam_image.py

Lines 159 to 161 in f3df1e8

	# Adjust tolerance for machine precision with float32 drizzle code
	fitsdiff_default_kwargs["rtol"] = 1e-4
	fitsdiff_default_kwargs["atol"] = 2e-4

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.79%. Comparing base (6693ba6) to head (e18462d).
Report is 442 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8865   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.79%   61.79%           
=======================================
  Files         377      377           
  Lines       38838    38832    -6     
=======================================
- Hits        24000    23997    -3     
+ Misses      14838    14835    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[melanieclarke]

Regression tests running again here:
https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/11240481808

Mac tests failed for unrelated reasons, but Linux tests look as expected.

[tapastro]

👍

[emolter]

Tolerances should still be small enough to catch glaring issues, LGTM