Fix crds keywords

[schlafly]

We missed updating the CRDS version & context keywords as part of the B16 L1/L2 metadata refactoring. This PR updates their names.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.25%. Comparing base (9031ae1) to head (642096e).
Report is 140 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1510   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.25%   76.25%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines        7639     7639           
=======================================
  Hits         5825     5825           
  Misses       1814     1814           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[schlafly]

I did a regression test run here:
https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/11803097124
The failures are all ~expected changes in crds.sw_version and crds.context_used. But okifying won't do the right thing because the L1s also have these fields and so the new files that are being made have both the new and old keywords. We need to use a new set of L1s that I've prepared in /grp/roman/eschlafly/romanisim/20241112/regtestl1s to fix this.

[mairanteodoro]

Looks good to me.

[mairanteodoro]

We need to use a new set of L1s that I've prepared in /grp/roman/eschlafly/romanisim/20241112/regtestl1s to fix this.

I ran all the regtests locally on the new L1 files and they all passed, except for one that was expected and will be fixed after okifying it.

[ddavis-stsci]

LGTM

[mairanteodoro]

Looks good.