RCAL-332 populate meta.ref_file

[cshanahan1]

GitHub issue, Closes #

Resolves RCAL-332

Description

This PR addresses ...

Checklist

• Tests

• Documentation

• Change log

• Milestone

• Label(s)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #492 (bf8e9fd) into main (2ef49c9) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

❗ Current head bf8e9fd differs from pull request most recent head 55653ee. Consider uploading reports for the commit 55653ee to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #492      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.45%   79.36%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        1212     1231      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits          963      977      +14     
- Misses        249      254       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	79.45% <100.00%> (ø)		Carriedforward from 2ef49c9
unit	47.13% <25.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
romancal/stpipe/core.py	85.71% <50.00%> (-9.94%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ef49c9...55653ee. Read the comment docs.

[PaulHuwe]

Should this have a test?

[nden]

When I process a file with this PR, the ref_file structure is not completely populated, i.e. none of the reference file names is there, only the CRDS info.

cal.meta.ref_file
Out[4]: {'crds': {'context_used': 'roman_0033.pmap', 'sw_version': '11.16.1'}}

I think this may be an issue with the schema.

[nden]

Need to figure out why ref_file is not populated. It's best to start with reviewing the schema

[nden]

Looks good - two minor comments

[nden]

I verified this populates the ref_file structure. I'm seeing a validation error raised from calibration_software_version on the cal file. I don't think it's related to this PR.