-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid selecting always transitions when the preceeding transition doesn't change the state #4371
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 7034df5 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 7034df5:
|
@@ -1621,7 +1626,7 @@ export function macrostep( | |||
false, | |||
internalQueue | |||
); | |||
|
|||
shouldSelectEventlessTransitions = nextState !== previousState; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's worth noting that this also checks non-always transitions here. This check also doesn't cover the first selectTransitions
+microstep
within this macrostep
.
To be more consistent we should either:
- check the same for that first
microstep
- or only check this after executing an
always
transition
Which one sounds better to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think "or only check this after executing an always transition" sounds better
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree and I've pushed out an according change
…tatelyai/xstate into ignore-same-always-transitions
No description provided.