Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

require sync committee supermajority in CI #5085

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

etan-status
Copy link
Contributor

To better catch problems with sync committee messages in CI, extend local testnet simulation to also verify that each block is signed by a supermajority of the sync committee.

Requires #5083 and #5084

To better catch problems with sync committee messages in CI, extend
local testnet simulation to also verify that each block is signed
by a supermajority of the sync committee.

Requires #5083 and #5084
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Unit Test Results

         9 files  ±0    1 071 suites  ±0   38m 23s ⏱️ + 2m 12s
  3 699 tests ±0    3 420 ✔️ ±0  279 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
15 763 runs  ±0  15 458 ✔️ ±0  305 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 5ed1160. ± Comparison against base commit 8c6c8a0.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@tersec tersec force-pushed the dev/etan/ci-strictsync branch 2 times, most recently from 1d0d3c3 to 089a4a0 Compare June 16, 2023 08:44
@etan-status
Copy link
Contributor Author

There seems to be another issue, possibly around fork boundaries, as now slot 24 is failing, but not due to the VC anymore.

@etan-status
Copy link
Contributor Author

Requires #5089

@etan-status etan-status force-pushed the dev/etan/ci-strictsync branch 2 times, most recently from 1cc2d4f to 4301f70 Compare June 16, 2023 22:19
@tersec tersec merged commit 3a6b50c into unstable Jun 17, 2023
@tersec tersec deleted the dev/etan/ci-strictsync branch June 17, 2023 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants