-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement designs for sign in screens #9224
Comments
waouh great point What is the screen on the left and the one on the right, is that the difference between design and implementation, or difference between keycard multiaccount and non-keycard multiaccount ? aslo what do you mean by frozen account ? |
"Frozen accounts" is something I added just recently. An account turns frozen (btw it should be "Frozen key") when the user exceeds the number of attempts to enter the correct passcode. A frozen key is still listed in the list of available keys but is greyed out After a brief discussion with the design team, we decided to call it "frozen". "Blocked" might refer to something that has happened on behalf of the authority. "Locked" also did not feel right, so we settled on "frozen" |
|
@andmironov @yenda can you confirm flow 1 and 5 in this issue? Following the same rationale of not showing the key on the multiple accounts (aka Context: #8935 (comment) |
@hesterbruikman working on a more complete issue about Keycard sign-in with @guylouis to replace a number of smaller issues including this one will be ready next week. WIP #9264 |
@guylouis I'm reviewing your WIP #9264 - can we align on which of these issues we're selecting to fix? In my opinion, some of these issues are optimizations that can be punted until later, and I'd like to be consistent in fixing issues across keycard + regular screens. I think only issues pertaining to flow 5 should be fixed, because they're inconsistent with the regular screens. Here's my take on it: Issues identified in flow 1 + 3 do not need to be prioritized for v1. The changes to the menu elements ( I would like to separate out the lack of key indicator on the unlock screen, though. That to me is a v1 nice-to-have. Frozen account is a feature to be proposed + ranked in objective level roadmap planning. Some of the issues in flow 5 do need to be fixed for v1. Cancel should be replaced with back button for consistency.
Lastly, what are the different options for the |
@rachelhamlin check out the issues in #9264, all updated and cleaned up, some new issues added after review. Also this is part of many others #9365 |
@churik @rachelhamlin @andmironov so is everything in the original issue still relevant and unique to this issue or can some of the scope be removed as already included in other issues? |
I'm not sure about priorities, for me this one sounds like |
Nice and granular. Thank you @guylouis @andmironov! I think we can close this one and replace it with #9264? |
@rachelhamlin #9264 will be in release scope? |
@churik I think we should segment it into P0 and P1. Working on it. I think the need to remove breadcrumbs is also missing... |
@rachelhamlin feel free to close this one after prioritizing #9264 |
Feature Issue
User Story
As a user, I want to see consistent sign in screens across the app.
Description
Figma: Sign In Design
Summary: currently across the app we have different from design login screens and mismatch in them for ordinary accounts and for keycard.
Acceptance Criteria
For V1 is required from my POV to implement:
Now => should be
![diffs](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4557972/66914520-42f86580-f017-11e9-9e71-210fb8a6aa31.png)
I think we can skip frosen account for now, I don't know should it be implemented in v1 scope or not (cc @guylouis @rachelhamlin )
Now => should be
![dsfsddsdsdf](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4557972/66915456-573d6200-f019-11e9-8403-29db0f9bdf38.png)
Cancel should be replaced with Back button, as for ordinary accounts.Notes
I believe we can skip
Trouble sign in?
popup, frozen account and all flows related to biometric for now.@rachelhamlin please, edit an issue if you think they are required for V1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: