Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set initial block range for a newly created account #16835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2023

Conversation

rasom
Copy link
Contributor

@rasom rasom commented Aug 2, 2023

Currently we try to fetch transfer history for a newly created account which costs us some unnecessary rpc requests

This can be fixed by setting initial blocks range as scanned, and worked like this with an old version of onboarding.

status: ready

@rasom rasom self-assigned this Aug 2, 2023
@rasom rasom requested review from flexsurfer and J-Son89 August 2, 2023 09:22
@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

status-im-auto commented Aug 2, 2023

Jenkins Builds

Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
42d3ae7 #1 2023-08-02 09:25:48 ~3 min tests 📄log
✔️ 42d3ae7 #1 2023-08-02 09:28:44 ~6 min android 🤖apk 📲
✔️ 42d3ae7 #1 2023-08-02 09:29:09 ~6 min android-e2e 🤖apk 📲
✔️ 42d3ae7 #1 2023-08-02 09:32:01 ~9 min ios 📱ipa 📲
✔️ ad17c37 #2 2023-08-02 09:47:19 ~5 min android 🤖apk 📲
✔️ ad17c37 #2 2023-08-02 09:47:28 ~6 min android-e2e 🤖apk 📲
✔️ ad17c37 #2 2023-08-02 09:48:20 ~6 min ios 📱ipa 📲
✔️ ad17c37 #2 2023-08-02 09:50:53 ~9 min tests 📄log

@rasom rasom force-pushed the fix/set-initial-range-for-a-new-account branch from 42d3ae7 to ad17c37 Compare August 2, 2023 09:41
@rasom rasom merged commit ad17c37 into develop Aug 2, 2023
@rasom rasom deleted the fix/set-initial-range-for-a-new-account branch August 2, 2023 10:17
Comment on lines +145 to +146
(if (or new-account? recovered-account?)
(profile.create/login-new-profile recovered-account?)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was always false here before, likely this if clause is not needed

@J-Son89
Copy link
Contributor

J-Son89 commented Aug 2, 2023

I think this pr should have went through some QA before merging. We have agreed to at least confirm with QA team if changes are simple enough that a pr doesn't need testing. cc @churik 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants