Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.7.2 to 1.7.4 #193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2024

Conversation

sumn2u
Copy link
Owner

@sumn2u sumn2u commented Aug 15, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • client/package.json
  • client/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
  833  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
annotate-lab ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 15, 2024 6:55am

@sumn2u sumn2u merged commit c73d1eb into master Aug 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@sumn2u sumn2u deleted the snyk-fix-5c70b916b9b258dd52325d43f496d260 branch August 18, 2024 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants