Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

draft blog post about sveltekit #5638

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 4, 2020
Merged

draft blog post about sveltekit #5638

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 4, 2020

Conversation

Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

We never did quite figure out whether it's going to be SvelteKit or Svelte Kit or svelte-kit or svelte/kit or something else entirely — if anyone has strong opinions, this is the place to share them.

Also, if there's any obvious stuff I missed from this post, let me know

@benmccann
Copy link
Member

lgtm. and I'm glad you went with the SvelteKit variant 😄

@vedam
Copy link
Member

vedam commented Nov 3, 2020

hey all,
concerning naming I just want to throw in my two cents from the design-view of things.
I try to figure out on how we treat/see KIT in context of svelte.
Is ist a product, a subbrand, a tool? Because this will influence the way we want to deal with it visually later.
I've made a quick rough'n'dirty to visualize what I mean.
And from what we have so far with our branding, I'm not really happy with CamelCase-Kit. ;-)

brand-perspective

@antony
Copy link
Member

antony commented Nov 3, 2020 via email

@vedam
Copy link
Member

vedam commented Nov 3, 2020

Are we using it standalone somewhere (i.e. an own landing-page), or will it always been seen in conjunction with SVELTE?

@benmccann
Copy link
Member

It will be hosted on kit.svelte.dev

While the Svelte logo is written in all caps on svelte.dev, people still write Svelte when writing it (instead of all caps). I think the most consistent thing to do here would be to do the same and make the logo something like the fourth one where it's all caps, but still write SvelteKit in the text.

@arxpoetica
Copy link
Member

@vedam awesome work. We should probably separate out the branding stuff into its own ticket somewhere. Just so we don't muddy the waters here. Yes?

@vedam
Copy link
Member

vedam commented Nov 3, 2020

My fav is the second. SVELTE remains SVELTE and KIT is the engine behind.
kind of ... powered by

@vedam
Copy link
Member

vedam commented Nov 3, 2020

Ahh, ok sorry... just because Rich mentioned it on top...

@gterras
Copy link

gterras commented Nov 3, 2020

Two minors points :

  • the first sentence mentionning kit is Snowpack is at the vanguard of this movement, and it's what powers SvelteKit. it may need a dedicated introduction sentence.
  • In the Typescript part it would be nice to add if full TS support will still need svelte-check or if any other kind of enhancement is planned.

Copy link
Member

@arxpoetica arxpoetica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vedam oh, I guess you're right. Still might be good to have it's own ticket just so we can track any branding stuff when this gets merged.

@Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member Author

@gterras excellent points — I've addressed both of those in the updated copy

@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris merged commit 703ffe9 into master Nov 4, 2020
@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris deleted the svelte-kit-blog-post branch November 4, 2020 06:00
@Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the feedback everyone, have merged this and will tweet out tomorrow at some point.

@vedam thanks for these ideas. I think I'm more into the all caps variants. I also wondered about something along these lines?

Screen Shot 2020-11-04 at 1 00 09 AM

taylorzane pushed a commit to taylorzane/svelte that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2020
* draft blog post about sveltekit

* make language less scary

* mention SvelteKit sooner

* expand on TS support

* tweak migration section

* change publication date

* replace video link with an embed

* small tweak
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants