Sweetmantech/myc 821 p1 plugin agentkit actionsts map tools #4
Conversation
- map Agentkit tools
- enumerate in switch
- minimize amount of work for net-new action
- if zero - awesome
- if 10 min - fine too
- reference: Reference AgentKit usage (see below)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new package Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Agent as Agent Runtime
participant AgentKit as AgentKit Plugin
participant Wallet as Wallet Provider
participant Tools as CDP Toolkit
Agent->>AgentKit: Check CDP API Keys
alt Keys Present
AgentKit->>Wallet: Get Wallet Address
Wallet-->>AgentKit: Return Wallet Address
AgentKit->>Tools: Initialize Toolkit
AgentKit->>Agent: Register Actions
else Keys Missing
Agent->>Agent: Skip AgentKit Plugin
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
packages/plugin-agentkit/src/actions.ts (2)
164-164: Ensure result is serializable before using JSON.stringifyUsing
JSON.stringify(result)may throw an error ifresultcontains circular references or non-serializable data types. Consider implementing serialization safeguards or using a custom serializer to handle complex objects.Apply this diff to handle serialization errors:
- ${JSON.stringify(result)} + ${safeStringify(result)}And define
safeStringifyfunction:function safeStringify(obj: unknown): string { try { return JSON.stringify(obj); } catch (error) { return 'Result could not be serialized.'; } }
98-112: Reuse existing toolkit instead of creating a new oneIn the
executeToolActionfunction, a newCdpToolkitinstance is created, and tools are retrieved again. Since the toolkit and tools are already available, consider passing them as parameters to avoid redundant computations and potential inconsistencies.Apply this diff to reuse the existing toolkit:
async function executeToolAction( tool: Tool, parameters: any, - client: CdpAgentkit + toolkit: CdpToolkit ): Promise<unknown> { - const toolkit = new CdpToolkit(client); const tools = toolkit.getTools(); const selectedTool = tools.find((t) => t.name === tool.name); if (!selectedTool) { throw new Error(`Tool ${tool.name} not found`); } return await selectedTool.call(parameters); }And update the function call at lines 64-68:
const result = await executeToolAction( tool, parameters, - client + cdpToolkit );packages/plugin-agentkit/src/provider.ts (1)
4-9: Handle potential errors when configuring the clientThe
getClientfunction does not include error handling for the asynchronousCdpAgentkit.configureWithWalletcall. If this promise rejects, it could lead to unhandled promise rejections.Apply this diff to add error handling:
export async function getClient(): Promise<CdpAgentkit> { const config = { networkId: "base-sepolia", }; - return await CdpAgentkit.configureWithWallet(config); + try { + return await CdpAgentkit.configureWithWallet(config); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error configuring CdpAgentkit:", error); + throw error; + } }This ensures that any errors during client configuration are logged and can be properly handled by the caller.
packages/plugin-agentkit/README.md (2)
1-12: Enhance documentation with additional sections.While the basic setup instructions are good, consider adding these essential sections:
- Required environment variables (especially CDP_API_KEY_NAME and CDP_API_KEY_PRIVATE_KEY)
- Example configuration
- Troubleshooting guide
- Version compatibility matrix
6-12: Add code examples to setup instructions.The setup steps would be more helpful with concrete code examples for each step.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.gitignore(1 hunks)agent/package.json(1 hunks)agent/src/index.ts(3 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/README.md(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/src/actions.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/src/provider.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/plugin-agentkit/tsup.config.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- packages/plugin-agentkit/package.json
- packages/plugin-agentkit/tsconfig.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/plugin-agentkit/tsup.config.ts (1)
3-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReview and update the build configuration.
- The comment "Ensure you're targeting CommonJS" contradicts the ESM-only format configuration.
- Consider adding TypeScript declaration file generation.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
export default defineConfig({ entry: ["src/index.ts"], outDir: "dist", sourcemap: true, clean: true, - format: ["esm"], // Ensure you're targeting CommonJS + format: ["esm"], + dts: true, // Generate declaration filesLet's verify the src/index.ts file exists:
agent/src/index.ts (2)
28-28: LGTM! New plugin import added.The import statement for the AgentKit plugin is correctly placed with other plugin imports.
405-410: LGTM! Improved code formatting.The array formatting change improves readability by placing each plugin on its own line.
agent/package.json (1)
30-30: LGTM! Dependency correctly added.The @ai16z/plugin-agentkit package is properly added as a workspace dependency, maintaining consistency with other internal packages.
| external: [ | ||
| "dotenv", // Externalize dotenv to prevent bundling | ||
| "fs", // Externalize fs to use Node.js built-in module | ||
| "path", // Externalize other built-ins if necessary | ||
| "@reflink/reflink", | ||
| "@node-llama-cpp", | ||
| "https", | ||
| "http", | ||
| "agentkeepalive", | ||
| "viem", | ||
| "@lifi/sdk" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unused external dependencies
The following packages are marked as external but are neither declared as dependencies nor used in the codebase:
- dotenv
- @reflink/reflink
- @node-llama-cpp
- agentkeepalive
- viem
- @lifi/sdk
Apply this diff to remove unused externals while maintaining the organized structure:
external: [
// Node.js built-in modules
"fs",
"path",
"http",
- "https",
-
- // Third-party dependencies
- "dotenv",
- "@reflink/reflink",
- "@node-llama-cpp",
- "agentkeepalive",
- "viem",
- "@lifi/sdk"
+ "https"
],🔗 Analysis chain
Organize and document external dependencies.
The external dependencies list mixes Node.js built-ins with third-party packages. Consider organizing them for better maintainability.
Apply this diff to improve organization:
external: [
- "dotenv", // Externalize dotenv to prevent bundling
- "fs", // Externalize fs to use Node.js built-in module
- "path", // Externalize other built-ins if necessary
- "@reflink/reflink",
- "@node-llama-cpp",
- "https",
- "http",
- "agentkeepalive",
- "viem",
- "@lifi/sdk"
+ // Node.js built-in modules
+ "fs",
+ "path",
+ "http",
+ "https",
+
+ // Third-party dependencies
+ "dotenv",
+ "@reflink/reflink",
+ "@node-llama-cpp",
+ "agentkeepalive",
+ "viem",
+ "@lifi/sdk"Let's verify these dependencies are declared in package.json:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all external third-party packages are listed in package.json
PACKAGES=("dotenv" "@reflink/reflink" "@node-llama-cpp" "agentkeepalive" "viem" "@lifi/sdk")
for pkg in "${PACKAGES[@]}"; do
if ! grep -q "\"$pkg\":" "packages/plugin-agentkit/package.json" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "Warning: $pkg is marked as external but not found in package.json"
fi
done
Length of output: 1588
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check root package.json for these dependencies
echo "=== Checking root package.json ==="
PACKAGES=("dotenv" "@reflink/reflink" "@node-llama-cpp" "agentkeepalive" "viem" "@lifi/sdk")
for pkg in "${PACKAGES[@]}"; do
if grep -q "\"$pkg\":" "package.json" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "Found $pkg in root package.json"
fi
done
echo -e "\n=== Checking imports in plugin-agentkit ==="
# Search for import statements of these packages
for pkg in "${PACKAGES[@]}"; do
echo "Imports of $pkg:"
rg "from ['\"]${pkg}['\"]|require\(['\"]${pkg}['\"]\)" "packages/plugin-agentkit/" || true
done
Length of output: 1856
| const agentkit = await getClient(); | ||
| const cdpToolkit = new CdpToolkit(agentkit); | ||
| const tools = cdpToolkit.getTools(); | ||
| console.log("SWEETMAN------------------------"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove debugging console.log statements before deployment
The console.log statements at lines 32, 48, and 94 appear to be used for debugging purposes. It's recommended to remove these statements or replace them with appropriate logging mechanisms to maintain clean console output in production environments and prevent potential information leakage.
Apply this diff to remove the debug statements:
- console.log("SWEETMAN------------------------");- console.log("SWEETMAN CLIENT------------------------", client);- console.log("SWEETMAN ACTIONS------------------------", actions);Also applies to: 48-48, 94-94
| export async function getAgentKitActions({ | ||
| getClient, | ||
| config, | ||
| }: GetAgentKitActionsParams): Promise<Action[]> { | ||
| const agentkit = await getClient(); | ||
| const cdpToolkit = new CdpToolkit(agentkit); | ||
| const tools = cdpToolkit.getTools(); | ||
| console.log("SWEETMAN------------------------"); | ||
|
|
||
| const actions = tools.map((tool: Tool) => ({ | ||
| name: tool.name.toUpperCase(), | ||
| description: tool.description, | ||
| similes: [], | ||
| validate: async () => true, | ||
| handler: async ( | ||
| runtime: IAgentRuntime, | ||
| message: Memory, | ||
| state: State | undefined, | ||
| options?: Record<string, unknown>, | ||
| callback?: HandlerCallback | ||
| ): Promise<boolean> => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const client = await getClient(); | ||
| console.log("SWEETMAN CLIENT------------------------", client); | ||
| let currentState = | ||
| state ?? (await runtime.composeState(message)); | ||
| currentState = | ||
| await runtime.updateRecentMessageState(currentState); | ||
|
|
||
| const parameterContext = composeParameterContext( | ||
| tool, | ||
| currentState | ||
| ); | ||
| const parameters = await generateParameters( | ||
| runtime, | ||
| parameterContext, | ||
| tool | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const result = await executeToolAction( | ||
| tool, | ||
| parameters, | ||
| client | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const responseContext = composeResponseContext( | ||
| tool, | ||
| result, | ||
| currentState | ||
| ); | ||
| const response = await generateResponse( | ||
| runtime, | ||
| responseContext | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| callback?.({ text: response, content: result }); | ||
| return true; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| const errorMessage = | ||
| error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error); | ||
| callback?.({ | ||
| text: `Error executing action ${tool.name}: ${errorMessage}`, | ||
| content: { error: errorMessage }, | ||
| }); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| examples: [], | ||
| })); | ||
| console.log("SWEETMAN ACTIONS------------------------", actions); | ||
| return actions; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add unit tests for the newly implemented functions
The functions getAgentKitActions, executeToolAction, composeParameterContext, generateParameters, composeResponseContext, and generateResponse contain complex logic and asynchronous operations. Adding unit tests will help ensure their correctness and facilitate future maintenance.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for these functions?
| actions: await getAgentKitActions({ | ||
| getClient, | ||
| config: { | ||
| networkId: "base-sepolia", | ||
| }, | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using top-level await to prevent module initialization issues
Using await at the top level in actions: await getAgentKitActions({...}) can lead to module initialization problems, especially if the environment doesn't support top-level await. This pattern may cause the module to export a Promise instead of the agentKitPlugin object, potentially breaking imports in other parts of the application.
Apply this diff to restructure the code using an asynchronous initialization function:
-export const agentKitPlugin: Plugin = {
+export async function createAgentKitPlugin(): Promise<Plugin> {
name: "[AgentKit] Integration",
description: "AgentKit integration plugin",
providers: [walletProvider],
evaluators: [],
services: [],
- actions: await getAgentKitActions({
+ const actions = await getAgentKitActions({
getClient,
config: {
networkId: "base-sepolia",
},
}),
+ return {
+ name: "[AgentKit] Integration",
+ description: "AgentKit integration plugin",
+ providers: [walletProvider],
+ evaluators: [],
+ services: [],
+ actions,
+ };
};
-export default agentKitPlugin;
+export default createAgentKitPlugin;This approach encapsulates the asynchronous operation within a function, allowing callers to handle the Promise accordingly.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| actions: await getAgentKitActions({ | |
| getClient, | |
| config: { | |
| networkId: "base-sepolia", | |
| }, | |
| }), | |
| export async function createAgentKitPlugin(): Promise<Plugin> { | |
| const actions = await getAgentKitActions({ | |
| getClient, | |
| config: { | |
| networkId: "base-sepolia", | |
| }, | |
| }), | |
| return { | |
| name: "[AgentKit] Integration", | |
| description: "AgentKit integration plugin", | |
| providers: [walletProvider], | |
| evaluators: [], | |
| services: [], | |
| actions, | |
| }; | |
| }; | |
| export default createAgentKitPlugin; |
| const address = (await (client as any).wallet.addresses)[0].id; | ||
| return `AgentKit Wallet Address: ${address}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using 'as any' and ensure proper type safety
The use of (client as any).wallet.addresses bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which can lead to runtime errors if the structure of client.wallet doesn't match expectations. Define appropriate types for client.wallet.addresses and add checks to handle cases where the addresses array may be empty or undefined.
Apply this diff to improve type safety and error handling:
const client = await getClient();
- const address = (await (client as any).wallet.addresses)[0].id;
+ const walletAddresses = await client.wallet.addresses;
+ if (walletAddresses && walletAddresses.length > 0) {
+ const address = walletAddresses[0].id;
+ return `AgentKit Wallet Address: ${address}`;
+ } else {
+ console.error("No wallet addresses found.");
+ return null;
+ }Ensure that the CdpAgentkit class has proper TypeScript definitions for the wallet property and its addresses.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| getSecret(character, "CDP_API_KEY_NAME") && | ||
| getSecret(character, "CDP_API_KEY_PRIVATE_KEY") | ||
| ? agentKitPlugin | ||
| : null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Document CDP API key configuration variables
The following environment variables are used in the code but not documented:
CDP_API_KEY_NAMECDP_API_KEY_PRIVATE_KEY
Please add these variables to the environment setup section in the README and deployment guide, including their purpose and how to obtain them.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify CDP API key configuration.
The plugin is conditionally included based on two environment variables: CDP_API_KEY_NAME and CDP_API_KEY_PRIVATE_KEY. Please ensure these variables are documented in the README and deployment guide.
Run this script to check if the keys are documented:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CDP key documentation in README files
rg -i "CDP_API_KEY" --type md
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all markdown files
echo "=== Markdown files ==="
fd -e md
# Search for environment-related terms in markdown and env files
echo -e "\n=== Environment variables documentation ==="
rg -i "environment|env var|configuration" --type md
# Search for CDP-related terms
echo -e "\n=== CDP-related documentation ==="
rg -i "cdp|customer data platform" --type md
# Look for environment template files
echo -e "\n=== Environment templates ==="
fd -g "*.env*"
Length of output: 74277
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. |
Relates to
Risks
Background
What does this PR do?
What kind of change is this?
Documentation changes needed?
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
Detailed testing steps
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Dependencies
@ai16z/plugin-agentkitDocumentation