Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose logging filters as a cli argument #113

Closed
alcarney opened this issue Feb 24, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #116
Closed

Expose logging filters as a cli argument #113

alcarney opened this issue Feb 24, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #116
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp Issues that relate to the language server

Comments

@alcarney
Copy link
Member

An argument like --log-filter=f1,f2,f3 that allows the client to select output only from certain output "channels"

@alcarney alcarney self-assigned this Feb 24, 2021
@alcarney alcarney added enhancement New feature or request lsp Issues that relate to the language server labels Feb 24, 2021
alcarney added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2021
- `--cache-dir`, optionally allows for Language Clients to specify
  the directory where cached data should be stored. If not given the
  Language Server will choose a directory based on a hash of the
  `conf.py`'s filepath. Closes #115 
- `--hide-sphinx-output`, allows for Language Clients to prevent
  Sphinx's build log from being shown.
- `--log-filter`, allows for Language Clients to restrict log output
  to specific loggers. Can be given multiple times. Closes #113 
- `--log-level`, allows for Language Clients to specify the
  verbosity of the log they wish to receive. Closes #87 
- `-p`, `--port`, allows for Language Clients to interact with the
  Language Server over TCP, while setting the port number they wish
  to use. Closes #114
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp Issues that relate to the language server
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant