Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(protocol): introduce SgxOrZkVerifier to allow any valid proof #18793

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

YoGhurt111
Copy link
Contributor

Post-Pacaya fork, only one valid proof is required for verification.
So we introduce the SgxOrZkVerifier.

Copy link

openzeppelin-code bot commented Jan 20, 2025

feat(protocol): introduce SgxOrZkVerifier to allow any valid proof

Generated at commit: d0fe1893f987b73ddd0a078e3f94cebfa445f176

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
3
3
0
10
40
56
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

dantaik commented Jan 20, 2025

Actually post-Pacaya mainet, we need SGX + TDX as the minimal. We can have ZK on top of SGX+TDX.

@dantaik dantaik self-requested a review January 20, 2025 05:12
@YoGhurt111 YoGhurt111 merged commit 46b8ac3 into pacaya_fork Jan 20, 2025
5 checks passed
@YoGhurt111 YoGhurt111 deleted the feature/sgx-or-zk branch January 20, 2025 06:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants