Reformat comments in dispute-coordinator

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/real/ordering/mod.rs

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub struct OrderingProvider {
 pub struct CandidateComparator {
 	/// Block number of the relay parent.
 	///
-	/// Important, so we will be participating in oldest disputes first.
+	/// This is important because we will be participating in oldest disputes first.
 	///
 	/// Note: In theory it would make more sense to use the `BlockNumber` of the including
 	/// block, as inclusion time is the actual relevant event when it comes to ordering. The

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/status.rs

@@ -37,20 +37,19 @@ pub enum DisputeStatus {
 	/// The dispute is active and unconcluded.
 	#[codec(index = 0)]
 	Active,
-	/// The dispute has been concluded in favor of the candidate
-	/// since the given timestamp.
+	/// The dispute was in favor of the candidate since the given timestamp.
 	#[codec(index = 1)]
 	ConcludedFor(Timestamp),
-	/// The dispute has been concluded against the candidate
-	/// since the given timestamp.
+	/// The dispute was concluded against the candidate since the given timestamp.
 	///
 	/// This takes precedence over `ConcludedFor` in the case that
 	/// both are true, which is impossible unless a large amount of
 	/// validators are participating on both sides.
 	#[codec(index = 2)]
 	ConcludedAgainst(Timestamp),
-	/// Dispute has been confirmed (more than `byzantine_threshold` have already participated/ or
-	/// we have seen the candidate included already/participated successfully ourselves).
+	/// Dispute was confirmed (more than `byzantine_threshold` from all validators have already
+	/// participated or we have seen the candidate included already/participated successfully
+	/// ourselves).
 	#[codec(index = 3)]
 	Confirmed,
 }