Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: unexpected link convert #496

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

fix: unexpected link convert #496

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

tea-artist
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Mar 25, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8421720840

Details

  • 63 of 63 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
  • 762 unchanged lines in 27 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+53.9%) to 79.964%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
apps/nestjs-backend/src/global/knex/knex.extend.ts 2 45.24%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/features/collaborator/collaborator.service.ts 2 74.03%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/features/field/field-calculate/field-supplement.service.ts 2 95.18%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/share-db/utils.ts 3 77.14%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/utils/name-conversion.ts 4 76.47%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/features/access-token/access-token.service.ts 4 89.9%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/utils/file-utils.ts 6 83.78%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/features/field/model/field-dto/attachment-field.dto.ts 7 50.0%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/features/base/utils.ts 8 65.22%
apps/nestjs-backend/src/utils/update-order.ts 10 90.57%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8421663603: 53.9%
Covered Lines: 25183
Relevant Lines: 31493

💛 - Coveralls

@tea-artist tea-artist merged commit 98543ea into develop Mar 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@tea-artist tea-artist deleted the fix/convert-link branch March 25, 2024 15:21
@tea-artist tea-artist restored the fix/convert-link branch January 2, 2025 12:11
@tea-artist tea-artist deleted the fix/convert-link branch January 2, 2025 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bi-directional junctions can get out of sync with their underlying table
2 participants