-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactors update logic for TektonPipeline reconciler #841
Conversation
e2a8c11
to
aff038e
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-operator-unit-tests |
aff038e
to
3e61cc6
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-operator-integration-tests |
i think this is a gke issue. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nikhil-thomas The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Initially in pipeline installerset the annotation `lastAppliedHash` of TektonPipeline spec was stored instead of hash of spec of TektonInstallerSet Hence this patch stores the hash of spec of TektonInstallerSet as annotations to check if an upgrade is required for an installerset Signed-off-by: Puneet Punamiya <[email protected]>
3e61cc6
to
9273832
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/lgtm |
Initially in pipeline installerset the annotation
lastAppliedHash
of TektonPipeline spec was stored instead of hash of spec of
TektonInstallerSet
Hence this patch stores the hash of spec of TektonInstallerSet
as annotations to check if an upgrade is required for an installerset
Signed-off-by: Puneet Punamiya [email protected]
Changes
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
See the contribution guide for more details.
Release Notes