-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LRU cache ensureFits() tweaks WRT deadlocking #796
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
621d87d
store/cache: add a case for when item > max LRU size
40e7108
store/cache: return true if items fit in the cache
92dd5f7
store/cache_test: move around names and comments
fe8db57
store/cache: inline ensureFits() call
045969d
store/cache: use Inc() instead of Add(1)
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
// Tests out the index cache implementation. | ||
package store | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"testing" | ||
|
||
"github.com/improbable-eng/thanos/pkg/testutil" | ||
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus" | ||
) | ||
|
||
// TestIndexCacheEdge tests the index cache edge cases. | ||
func TestIndexCacheEdge(t *testing.T) { | ||
metrics := prometheus.NewRegistry() | ||
cache, err := newIndexCache(metrics, 1) | ||
testutil.Ok(t, err) | ||
|
||
fits := cache.ensureFits([]byte{42, 24}) | ||
testutil.Equals(t, fits, false) | ||
|
||
fits = cache.ensureFits([]byte{42}) | ||
testutil.Equals(t, fits, true) | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could do more aggressive removal if the slice is big enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but how the implementation would be like? I have two ideas:
b
?Either way, the scope would definitely blow up since I do not think it is worth making these kinds of changes without scrupulous benchmarking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Either way, maybe lets leave it for another day? I am mainly interested now in making sure that the loop doesn't go forever
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree