use shared github workflow to run tests

[evgeni]

No description provided.

[evgeni]

cold cache: 13m 24s (https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_rh_cloud/actions/runs/7567480704/job/20606728804)
warn cache: 11m 18s (https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_rh_cloud/actions/runs/7567634004/job/20607196990)
old action: 7m 50s (https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_rh_cloud/actions/runs/7531259398/job/20499435028)

so, while slower, certainly not bad

[ekohl]

Should this also drop the "build container" workflows, since they're no longer needed?

[ekohl]

This fails in a migration, probably because the plugin can't be installed after Foreman has already been installed. I suppose that's another difference in migrations. Perhaps our reusable action should test both approaches.

[evgeni]

This fails in a migration, probably because the plugin can't be installed after Foreman has already been installed. I suppose that's another difference in migrations. Perhaps our reusable action should test both approaches.

Correct.

• I've opened https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/37076 to track this in Katello
• I've opened make it possible to skip existing DB tests actions#32 to allow us to skip this while ☝️ is not fixed
• The reusable action does test db:seed in the "normal" flow (install foreman and plugin in the same run) since theforeman/actions@590eefb, so no action needed

[evgeni]

I've split out some of the changes here into #867 and #868 as they are only indirectly related to the whole GHA change

[ShimShtein]

@evgeni , can you define the version of Foreman you want to use for the tests? I see the action uses the develop branch by default. It won't be good enough for stable branches.

[evgeni]

Of course, which ones would you like? 3.9 and develop?

[evgeni]

Of course, which ones would you like? 3.9 and develop?

I've implemented 3.9 an develop now, what do you think? :)

[ekohl]

@ShimShtein could you have a look?

[ShimShtein]

Merged, thanks @evgeni !

Do you expect we will need to cherry-pick this one to older branches of the plugin?

[evgeni]

Nah, as long as it's in the one for 3.10, we're good

[ShimShtein]

Which version of Katello are we using? I will probably need to freeze Katello and REX versions. Is there an option to do that, or do I need to freeze them in the gemspec?

[evgeni]

Whichever the gemspec allows is used, yeah.