Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade snyk from 1.526.0 to 1.529.0 #76

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2021

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade snyk from 1.526.0 to 1.529.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 3 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2021-04-08.
Release notes
Package name: snyk from snyk GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: snyk
  • 414aeb6 Merge pull request #1799 from snyk/fix/display-current-path-folder
  • be27cf8 fix: display current folder instead of . for fix
  • 1ce6576 Merge pull request #1798 from snyk/fix/improved-elixir-errors
  • c0278f1 fix: improved error messages in elixir
  • ed3e46b Merge pull request #1797 from snyk/feat/support-constraints-fix
  • 51b306e Merge pull request #1793 from snyk/fix/add-error-for-helm-files-CC-768
  • 1d95247 feat: @ snyk/fix version with constraints support
  • 3ca490a refactor: Scanning Helm files for iac test fails for --experimental

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants