Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TM-546] Remove edo2net tests #172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ixahedron
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Problem: protocol 008 has become obsolete.

Solution: remove tests for 008 local chain and edo2net from the CI.

Related issue(s)

Resolves part of TM-546

✅ Checklist for your Pull Request

Related changes (conditional)

  • Tests

    • If I added new functionality, I added tests covering it.
    • If I fixed a bug, I added a regression test to prevent the bug from
      silently reappearing again.
  • Documentation

    • I checked whether I should update the docs and did so if necessary:
    • I updated changelog unless I am sure my changes are
      not essential.

Stylistic guide (mandatory)

Problem: protocol 008 has become obsolete.

Solution: remove tests for 008 local chain and edo2net from the CI.
@ixahedron ixahedron requested a review from rvem May 18, 2021 13:11
@ixahedron ixahedron self-assigned this May 18, 2021
@@ -146,8 +119,8 @@ steps:
if: *not_scheduled
depends_on:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, why packaging depends on nettests? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ixahedron ixahedron May 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's buildkite dependencies, meaning the packaging step should only run after nettests are run to ensure they pass, I assume.

@ixahedron ixahedron merged commit 9cd46d3 into master May 18, 2021
@ixahedron ixahedron deleted the ixahedron/tm546-disable-edo2net branch May 18, 2021 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants