Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

B-22205 B-22209 B-22210 Fix TGET ingestion for good #14807

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

cameroncaci
Copy link
Contributor

B-22205
B-22209
B-22210

Warning

Hard blocked by I-13833

Note

Feature E-06422 will help resolve the blocker

See parent PR
transcom/trdm-lambda#34

cameroncaci and others added 21 commits February 4, 2025 18:17
…-dest-move

B-22480 - fix issue with null Prime API call and AK destination moves
…tRequestIDInUseErrorFix

B 22271 main office user account request id in use error fix
B-22247 bug fixes for queue assignment
@cameroncaci cameroncaci added Mountain Movers Movin' Mountains 1 Sprint at a time INTEGRATION Slated for Integration Testing labels Feb 13, 2025
@cameroncaci cameroncaci requested a review from a team February 13, 2025 14:32
@cameroncaci cameroncaci self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@cameroncaci cameroncaci requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 14:32
Copy link
Contributor

@danieljordan-caci danieljordan-caci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

migrations look good

Copy link
Contributor

@traskowskycaci traskowskycaci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No concerns here, blocker noted and agree with the plan in the new future to resolve.

@deandreJones
Copy link
Contributor

@cameroncaci for the blocking issue- RDS likely unable to perform
do we hav a plan forward to get this in? could we run these scripts over night- 1 by 1?

or are we hoping to get RDS scaled up ?

@cameroncaci
Copy link
Contributor Author

cameroncaci commented Feb 18, 2025

@cameroncaci for the blocking issue- RDS likely unable to perform do we hav a plan forward to get this in? could we run these scripts over night- 1 by 1?

or are we hoping to get RDS scaled up ?

Pinged the BAs about it again in the issue ticket to try and make it a priority, it's currently at the architects. The plan (Or at least my plan, arch's haven't reached out to me yet) is to run one full DB sync, and then immediately replace it with incremental. We'll reserve full DB syncing for if any issues or HDTs pop up, but the incremental should be entirely fixed now.

BUT, the current RDS db can't even handle 1 full DB sync. Meaning we need to either:

  • Temporarily scale up RDS for the full sync (Cost effective but less preferred as it's less predictable when budgeting)
  • Temporarily have milmove downtime for 15 minutes while it can sync with TRDM
  • Permanently scale up RDS (My preferred as it supports the application's growth and prevents unpredictable budget changes)

@cameroncaci cameroncaci merged commit 44b085a into integrationTesting Feb 18, 2025
5 checks passed
@cameroncaci cameroncaci deleted the b-22205-tget-enhancements-int branch February 18, 2025 14:19
@deandreJones
Copy link
Contributor

@cameroncaci for the blocking issue- RDS likely unable to perform do we hav a plan forward to get this in? could we run these scripts over night- 1 by 1?
or are we hoping to get RDS scaled up ?

Pinged the BAs about it again in the issue ticket to try and make it a priority, it's currently at the architects. The plan (Or at least my plan, arch's haven't reached out to me yet) is to run one full DB sync, and then immediately replace it with incremental. We'll reserve full DB syncing for if any issues or HDTs pop up, but the incremental should be entirely fixed now.

BUT, the current RDS db can't even handle 1 full DB sync. Meaning we need to either:

  • Temporarily scale up RDS for the full sync (Cost effective but less preferred as it's less predictable when budgeting)
  • Temporarily have milmove downtime for 15 minutes while it can sync with TRDM
  • Permanently scale up RDS (My preferred as it supports the application's growth and prevents unpredictable budget changes)

We might be able to get a temp outage for the sync - if the other 2 options don't pan out- but would need some planning
If you havnet already- might be a good idea to put the COAs in the issue so folks know the options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
INTEGRATION Slated for Integration Testing Mountain Movers Movin' Mountains 1 Sprint at a time
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants