Moving the docs examples section into guides #1356
Conversation
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@samejr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the documentation for Trigger.dev, including modifications to links for Puppeteer and FFmpeg examples, the introduction of a new guide for example tasks, and the removal of proxy authentication from the Puppeteer scraping function. Additionally, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/introduction.mdx (1)
27-32: Consider using distinct icons for each cardWhile using the same icon ("wand-magic-sparkles") for all cards maintains visual consistency, using distinct icons for each card could improve quick visual identification and navigation for users.
Consider using more specific icons for each card. For example:
- "Framework guides" could use an icon like "code" or "sitemap"
- "Example tasks" could use an icon like "list-check" or "clipboard"
This would help users quickly distinguish between different types of resources.
docs/mint.json (2)
98-98: Good change: Updated anchor nameRenaming the anchor from "Examples" to "Guides & examples" accurately reflects the consolidation of these sections. This change aligns with the PR objectives and improves navigation clarity.
Consider using "Guides & Examples" (capitalizing "Examples") for consistency with other anchor names in the file.
272-285: Great restructuring of documentation sectionsThe changes in this section effectively implement the PR objectives:
- The "Example tasks" group has been added under the Frameworks section, consolidating the examples as intended.
- The "Dashboard" group has been moved and updated.
- A new "Migrations" group has been added with information on upgrading from v2.
These changes improve the overall structure and navigation of the documentation, making it more intuitive for users.
Consider adding a brief description or introduction page to the new "Example tasks" group to help users understand the purpose and content of this section.
Also applies to: 289-290, 293-294
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx (0 hunks)
- docs/introduction.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/mint.json (8 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx
🔇 Additional comments not posted (8)
docs/introduction.mdx (2)
27-32: LGTM: New cards added successfullyThe addition of "Framework guides" and "Example tasks" cards aligns well with the PR objectives of consolidating Examples into the Guides section. This change should help streamline the documentation structure and reduce confusion for users.
30-32: Consider updating the "Example tasks" linkGiven that the Examples section has been moved into Guides, the link for the "Example tasks" card might need to be updated.
Please verify if the link "/examples/intro" is still correct, or if it should be updated to reflect the new structure (e.g., "/guides/frameworks/examples" or similar).
docs/mint.json (6)
4-4: LGTM: Improved formatting of "openapi" fieldThe "openapi" field has been condensed into a single line, which improves readability without affecting functionality.
90-93: Excellent: Added redirect for Examples sectionThe new redirect from "/docs/examples/:slug*" to "docs/guides/examples/:slug*" is crucial for maintaining link integrity after moving the Examples section into Guides. This ensures a smooth transition and prevents broken links, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives.
106-106: LGTM: Improved formatting of "Getting Started" pagesCondensing the "pages" array into a single line improves readability without affecting functionality.
113-113: LGTM: Improved formatting in "Fundamentals" groupThe "pages" arrays for "Tasks" and "Configuration" subgroups have been condensed into single lines, improving readability without affecting functionality.
Also applies to: 119-119
125-125: LGTM: Improved formatting in multiple groupsThe "pages" arrays for various groups and subgroups (Development, Deployment integrations, Wait, Tasks API, and Projects API) have been condensed into single lines. This improves readability and maintains consistency throughout the file without affecting functionality.
Also applies to: 135-135, 147-147, 165-165, 203-203
Line range hint
1-302: Overall assessment: Excellent restructuring of documentationThis PR successfully achieves its main objective of consolidating the Examples and Guides sections, improving the overall structure and navigation of the documentation. The changes include:
- Adding necessary redirects to maintain link integrity.
- Updating anchor names to reflect the new structure.
- Reorganizing and condensing various sections for improved readability.
- Creating a new "Example tasks" group under Frameworks.
- Updating the "Dashboard" and adding a "Migrations" section.
These changes will provide a more intuitive and less confusing experience for users navigating the documentation. The minor suggestions provided in the review comments can further enhance the user experience.
Great work on this restructuring! The changes align well with the PR objectives and improve the overall documentation structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/guides/examples/intro.mdx (1)
7-19: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured table of examplesThe table provides a clear and concise overview of various example tasks for using Trigger.dev. The content aligns well with the PR objectives of consolidating Examples under Guides. Each task is properly linked to its respective guide, and the descriptions are informative.
For improved consistency, consider standardizing the sentence structure in the descriptions. For example, the Puppeteer description could be adjusted to:
- | [Puppeteer](/guides/examples/puppeteer) | Use Puppeteer to generate a PDF or scrape a webpage. | + | [Puppeteer](/guides/examples/puppeteer) | Use Puppeteer to generate a PDF and scrape a webpage. |This minor change aligns it more closely with the structure of other descriptions in the table.
docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx (1)
146-146: Approved with a minor suggestion.The addition of information about using a BrowserBase proxy for web scraping is valuable and aligns with best practices. However, there's a minor grammatical improvement we can make.
Consider adding a comma after "In this example" for better readability:
-In this example we use [Puppeteer](https://pptr.dev/) with a [BrowserBase](https://www.browserbase.com/) proxy to scrape the GitHub stars count from the [Trigger.dev](https://trigger.dev) landing page and log it out. +In this example, we use [Puppeteer](https://pptr.dev/) with a [BrowserBase](https://www.browserbase.com/) proxy to scrape the GitHub stars count from the [Trigger.dev](https://trigger.dev) landing page and log it out.🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~146-~146: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ... from a web page ### Overview In this example we use Puppeteer w...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- docs/config/config-file.mdx (2 hunks)
- docs/guides/examples/intro.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx (2 hunks)
- docs/introduction.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/snippets/web-scraping-warning.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- docs/config/config-file.mdx
- docs/snippets/web-scraping-warning.mdx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/introduction.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx
[typographical] ~146-~146: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ... from a web page ### Overview In this example we use Puppeteer w...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (5)
docs/guides/examples/intro.mdx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Well-structured frontmatterThe YAML frontmatter is correctly formatted and provides relevant metadata for the document. The title and description accurately reflect the content of the file.
1-19: Great job on restructuring the documentation!This new
intro.mdxfile successfully addresses the main objective of the PR by integrating the Examples section into the Guides. The content is well-organized, clear, and provides users with a comprehensive overview of available example tasks. The table format makes it easy for users to quickly find relevant examples for their needs.The file structure and content quality contribute to a more cohesive and less confusing documentation experience, as intended by this PR.
docs/guides/examples/puppeteer.mdx (3)
14-16: LGTM: Links updated correctly.The links have been updated to reflect the new structure where Examples are now part of the Guides section. This change aligns with the PR objective of consolidating Examples under Guides.
Line range hint
1-246: Overall assessment: Documentation structure improved, but clarification needed on proxy usage.The changes in this file generally align with the PR objectives of moving the Examples section into Guides. The link updates and additional information about using a proxy for web scraping are valuable improvements.
However, the removal of proxy authentication from the
puppeteerScrapeWithProxyfunction raises concerns:
- It seems to contradict the emphasis on using a proxy for web scraping.
- This change isn't explained in the PR objectives.
To ensure consistency across the documentation, please clarify the intention behind removing proxy authentication and update the documentation accordingly if this change is intentional.
Line range hint
168-169: Clarification needed: Removal of proxy authentication.The proxy authentication setup has been removed from the
puppeteerScrapeWithProxyfunction. This change seems to contradict the emphasis on using a proxy for web scraping, as mentioned in the note above the code.Could you please clarify the rationale behind removing the proxy authentication? If this was intentional, we might need to update the accompanying documentation to reflect this change.
To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help us ensure that all relevant parts of the documentation are consistent with this change.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of proxy authentication.
The search did not find any remaining references to
proxy authenticationin the documentation or TypeScript files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to proxy authentication in the codebase # Test: Search for proxy authentication related code rg --type mdx --type typescript 'page.authenticate|proxy authentication' docs/Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to proxy authentication in the codebase # Test: Search for proxy authentication related code in .mdx and .ts files rg -g "*.mdx" -g "*.ts" 'page.authenticate|proxy authentication' docs/Length of output: 72
It's a bit confusing having 2 separate concepts for Guides and Examples. They are very similar. So now they are all under one roof and hopefully less confusing.
Summary by CodeRabbit