Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the node selection algorithm broken in #117 #128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2017

Conversation

jpwhite4
Copy link
Member

@jpwhite4 jpwhite4 commented May 5, 2017

Description

The algorithm that determines whether a node should be selected
was incorrectly broken in the cleanup task in #117. This pull request
restores the original code.

Motivation and Context

manual revert of erroneous change

Tests performed

Ran the automated UI tests

XDMoD
General
✓ Verify Logo and Title (859ms)

Login
✓ Click the login link (642ms)
✓ Should Login (345ms)
✓ Display Logged in Users Name (698ms)

Job Viewer
✓ Selected (739ms)
✓ Has Instructions (12ms)
✓ Instructions look the same as previous run (1702ms)
Quick Lookup
No results
✓ Click the search button (188ms)
✓ Perform a basic search (478ms)
✓ Have no results (343ms)
✓ Cancel search (90ms)
With results
✓ Click the search button (43ms)
✓ Perform a basic search (1021ms)
✓ View saved job then delete it. (2692ms)

Advanced Search
Simple single filter lookup
✓ Click the search button (60ms)
✓ Add filters; Run Search (1886ms)
✓ Select Search Results (424ms)
✓ View saved job then delete it. (2847ms)

Tree Sort Order
✓ Click the search button (117ms)
✓ Perform a basic search (1171ms)
✓ View saved job. (1534ms)
✓ Change sort order (1616ms)
✓ View saved job then delete it. (1217ms)

Job Tab Clicks
✓ Click the search button (54ms)
✓ Perform a basic search (919ms)
✓ View saved job timeseries. (4681ms)

Edit Search
Testing 'edit search' on a Quick Lookup Search
Create a Quick Lookup Search
✓ Click the search button (70ms)
✓ Perform a Quick Lookup (978ms)
Perform 'Edit' action on newly created Quick Lookup
✓ Perform 'Edit Search' Action (1058ms)
✓ Validate that the search parameters have been set correctly. (33ms)
✓ Change the Job Number (762ms)
✓ Perform 'Edit Search' Action Again (981ms)
✓ Validate that the search parameters have been set correctly. (652ms)
Delete Basic search
✓ Perform Delete (1323ms)
Testing 'edit search' on an Advanced Search
Create Advanced Search
✓ Click the search button (54ms)
✓ Fill in Advanced Search Parameters (2081ms)
✓ Save Advanced Search Parameters (60ms)
Edit the newly created Advanced Search
✓ Perform the 'Edit Search' action (1312ms)
✓ Validate that the search criteria was set correctly (353ms)
✓ Validate that we have the correct number of results set (352ms)
✓ Change the selected records (484ms)
Delete the Advanced Search
✓ Perform Delete Action (2112ms)
Edit a Metric Explorer Search
✓ Click the Metric Explorer Tab (2143ms)
✓ Open the SUPREMM metrics (2108ms)
✓ Save the chart title for later (170ms)
✓ Click the first data point for the first data series (125ms)
✓ Open 'Show Raw Data' Window (427ms)
✓ Select an entry in the 'Show Raw Data' window (434ms)
✓ verify that we have the correct job open (830ms)
✓ Verify that the 'Edit Search' action is disabled (550ms)
Delete the Metric Explorer Search
✓ Perform Delete Action (221ms)

Save coverage report
✓ Get the report and save (5ms)

Logout
✓ Click the logout link (130ms)
✓ Display Logged out State (452ms)
Update Screenshot Repository
✓ Should upload screenshots (0ms)

55 passing (47.70s)

The algorithm that determines whether a node should be selected
was incorrectly broken in the cleanup task in ubccr#117. This pull request
restores the original code.
@jpwhite4 jpwhite4 merged commit 1fd2adc into ubccr:xdmod7.0 May 5, 2017
@jpwhite4 jpwhite4 deleted the drillfix branch May 5, 2017 21:09
@tyearke tyearke added the bug Bugfixes label May 10, 2017
@tyearke tyearke added this to the v7.0.0 milestone May 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bugfixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants