-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
group: do not cycle when urgent #890
Comments
Things can be improved. I think that maybe with the group if one or more module(s) is urgent then we just cycle between urgent modules. The problem is what if as a user say github is urgent but I still want the group to cycle? The frame should probably learn to only show as urgent if one of it's content it is showing is urgent. It would cause the urgent to come and go though which would be annoying. |
We have The user should not ignore urgent then... or use |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Is the real solution here more about 'suspending' modules when they are hidden? So if a cycling group is in a frame it would stop cycling until the frame is reopened. Of course it would still do its switching to urgent even though 'suspended'. This would take some work as we'd need to pull the cycling out of modules 'direct' control or else the code gets hard to maintain for consistency. Your branch has too many unrelated changes to easily see what you are trying to do. Small is beautiful |
The problem I ran into with With this branch, I keep a history of all urgent boolean and keep rechecking as it rotates... allowing I hadn't tested this with |
@lasers ? still wanted? |
@ultrabug I guess we can close this. I'm not currently using |
@ultrabug The branch above is live again. Rebased too. It is still not small nor beautiful. Maybe try this out for a week or two... and compare against |
Maybe, could you move it to this repo so that comparing / testing is easier plz ? |
Done. |
I was looking into this and found out that master Clicking the button has no effect any more |
Remove We support Also, if you merge #1746, you can use new option |
No I won't remove it from general, users do this just like I did. py3status should handle it, that's all. I found the culprit then, this branch works for me |
Since we merged PR to support
frame: pls expose urgent modules
, there have been several "false" positive for urgent in frame. The reason is that the group can cycle modules including urgent ones... so you expands the frame, see nothing, and scroll the group to find the hidden urgent module.Too many times when I get an urgent, I unfold and see nothing. I think group should stop cycling when urgent... so group and frame could work together much better than before.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: