-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Style Guide revision 2 #142
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 06852275771daae94176f41bc9291525e3727753-PR-142
💛 - Coveralls |
Were you planning to discuss the (non) builder pattern? |
No, since we decided to go with options struct, I recommended it for constructors. Why would I list a pattern we don't want to promote? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks; for some reason I wasn't seeing all the diffs. I now see the section where you're documenting the recommendation to use an options bag.
Thanks! Updated to your comments! |
Thanks. Ready for re-review. |
Ready for re-review. |
Fixes #112.
I shied away from extending the
errors
bit because the changes are large enough as is, and I'd prefer to keep #118 for another revision later.