Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No ExtPict for old symbols #1019

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

eggrobin
Copy link
Member

[182-C20] Consensus: Unassign the Extended_Pictographic property from the 672 assigned characters that do not have the Emoji property. For Unicode Version 17.0. See L2/25-006 item 5.1.

[182-A57] Action Item for Robin Leroy, PAG: In UCD file emoji-data.txt, unassign the Extended_Pictographic property from the 672 assigned characters that do not have the Emoji property. For Unicode Version 17.0. See L2/25-006 item 5.1.

emoji-data.txt being generated from itself, this was done by regenerating it with the patch in 8a59f48 (reverted afterwards).

The output was:

Unassigning Extended_Pictographic from 689 characters, including 672 characters present in 16.0, as well as:

# ================================================

#

1F777..1F77A      # E0.0   [4] (🝷..🝺)    VESTA FORM TWO..PARTHENOPE FORM TWO
1F8D0..1F8D8      # E0.0   [9] (🣐..🣘)    LONG RIGHTWARDS ARROW OVER LONG LEFTWARDS ARROW..LONG LEFT RIGHT ARROW WITH DEPENDENT LOBE
1FA54..1FA57      # E0.0   [4] (🩔..🩗)    WHITE CHESS FERZ..BLACK CHESS ALFIL

# Total elements: 17
Found difference in : C:\Users\robin\Projects\Unicode\unicodetools\unicodetools\data\ucd\dev\emoji\emoji-data.txt, C:\Users\robin\Projects\Unicode\unicodetools\unicodetools\data\ucd\dev\emoji\49238-emoji-data.txt
 File1: '23', '88          ; Extended_Pictographic# E0.0   [1] (⎈)       HELM SYMBOL'
 File2: '23', 'CF          ; Extended_Pictographic# E1.0   [1] (⏏️)       eject button'

@eggrobin eggrobin requested review from nedley and markusicu January 29, 2025 17:59
@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit f011b6e into unicode-org:main Jan 29, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants