feat: introduce answer collections and mechanisms to manage them #4421
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sjschlapbach has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive feature for managing answer collections in the KlickerUZH platform. The changes span multiple components of the system, including Prisma schema, GraphQL services, frontend components, and internationalization. The implementation allows users to create, modify, and share answer collections with different access levels (Public, Private, Restricted), providing a flexible mechanism for knowledge sharing and collaboration. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (2)
298-316: Consider adding soft deletion supportThe
AnswerCollectionmodel might benefit from having soft deletion support to prevent accidental data loss and maintain historical records.Add an
isDeletedfield with a default value of false:model AnswerCollection { id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) name String description String? version Int @default(1) entries AnswerCollectionEntry[] + isDeleted Boolean @default(false) access CollectionAccess @default(PRIVATE) accessRequested User[] @relation("answerCollectionAccessRequested") accessGranted User[] @relation("answerCollectionShared")
318-326: Consider adding metadata fields for entry trackingThe
AnswerCollectionEntrymodel could benefit from additional metadata fields to track when entries were added and by whom.Add creation tracking fields:
model AnswerCollectionEntry { id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) value String collection AnswerCollection @relation(fields: [collectionId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade, onUpdate: Cascade) collectionId Int + createdAt DateTime @default(now()) + createdBy User @relation(fields: [createdById], references: [id]) + createdById String @db.Uuid @@unique([collectionId, value]) }packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101105648_answer_collections/migration.sql (2)
4-16: Consider adding database-level validation for name lengthThe
namefield in theAnswerCollectiontable should have a reasonable maximum length to prevent potential issues with extremely long names.Add a check constraint for the name length:
CREATE TABLE "AnswerCollection" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, - "name" TEXT NOT NULL, + "name" TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (char_length("name") <= 255), "description" TEXT, "version" INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1, "access" "CollectionAccess" NOT NULL DEFAULT 'PRIVATE', "ownerId" UUID, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, "updatedAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT "AnswerCollection_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );
18-25: Consider adding value length validationSimilar to the collection name, the
valuefield inAnswerCollectionEntryshould have a reasonable maximum length.Add a check constraint for the value length:
CREATE TABLE "AnswerCollectionEntry" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, - "value" TEXT NOT NULL, + "value" TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (char_length("value") <= 1000), "collectionId" INTEGER NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT "AnswerCollectionEntry_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101105648_answer_collections/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma (1)
115-117: LGTM: Relations are well-defined and follow naming conventions
The three new relations are correctly defined with appropriate names that clearly indicate their purpose:
answerCollections: Owner's collectionsrequestedCollections: Collections where access has been requestedsharedCollections: Collections shared with the user
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (1)
292-296: LGTM: Enum values are clear and comprehensive
The CollectionAccess enum provides a good set of access levels that cover the common use cases:
PUBLIC: Visible to all usersPRIVATE: Only visible to ownerRESTRICTED: Visible to specific users
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101105648_answer_collections/migration.sql (1)
43-48: Consider adding indexes for common query patterns
The current indexes cover uniqueness constraints, but depending on your query patterns, you might want to add additional indexes for performance optimization.
Let's analyze the schema to identify potential indexing needs:
✅ Verification successful
The current indexes are sufficient for the schema design
Based on the schema analysis, the current indexes adequately cover the main access patterns:
AnswerCollection_ownerId_name_keyensures uniqueness of collection names per owner and optimizes lookups by owner and nameAnswerCollectionEntry_collectionId_value_keyensures uniqueness of values within a collection and optimizes lookups of entries by collection and value- The implicit index on
collectionIdinAnswerCollectionEntry(created by the foreign key) optimizes lookups of entries by collection
Additional indexes would only be beneficial if there were specific query patterns requiring them, but the current schema suggests these are the primary access patterns. The existing indexes provide good coverage for typical operations like:
- Finding collections by owner
- Looking up collections by name
- Retrieving entries for a collection
- Checking for duplicate values in a collection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for similar patterns in existing tables
echo "Checking existing index patterns..."
rg "CREATE.*INDEX" --type sql
# Look for potential access patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking potential access patterns..."
rg -A 5 "AnswerCollection.*find" --type typescript
Length of output: 24058
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema definition and any related files
echo "Checking schema and related files..."
fd "schema.prisma" --exec cat {}
# Let's also check for any TypeScript files that might show usage patterns
echo "Checking TypeScript files for usage patterns..."
rg -t ts "AnswerCollection" -A 5
Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the schema and related files
echo "Checking schema..."
find . -name "schema.prisma" -type f -exec cat {} \;
# Let's also check for any model definitions related to AnswerCollection
echo "Checking for model definitions..."
rg "model AnswerCollection" -A 10 -B 2
Length of output: 2217
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101105648_answer_collections/migration.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
answer-collections
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 13m 30s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Julius Schlapbach |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
174
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1509427 | Triggered | Generic Password | c1d9c20 | packages/prisma/src/data/seedUsers.ts | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx (1)
5-20: Skeleton component implementation is solid.
This layout provides a clear structure for listing and creating answer collections. As you expand functionality, consider adding pagination or filtering if the list grows large.apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/analytics/index.tsx (1)
25-25: Handle null or undefined dataCourses gracefully
IfdataCourses?.userCoursesisnullorundefined, the child component might receive an empty or invalid array. EnsureCourseDashboardListcan handle such cases gracefully without errors or unexpected UI.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx (2)
10-11: Unused state browsingOpen
Currently,browsingOpenis set but not used beyond toggling true. Consider implementing or removing this state if browsing shared collections is not yet supported.
16-31: Improve user feedback by clarifying button actions
Naming or labeling the buttons can be more descriptive to indicate the creation vs. browsing action, especially if you plan to add more states or forms later.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (2)
41-50: Implement submission logic
The submission callback currently only logs the values. Make sure to integrate the actual logic for creating answer collections in the database or via an API call.Would you like help generating a placeholder API call or integration snippet?
125-131: Error message for minimal entries
The pattern for showing the error message is helpful. Consider adding a more dynamic approach later if additional validation error types are introduced.packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
1796-1826: Revisit naming for clarity and user-friendliness.Your newly introduced keys under
resourceslook consistent with existing patterns. Consider adding short usage comments or grouping them inside nested objects if you anticipate expansions (e.g., for categorizing media library vs. answer collections). This can promote better maintainability, especially if new resource types get introduced.packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (1)
260-265: Consider adding JSDoc comments for clarity and completeness.
While this enum addition aligns well with the new schema definitions, including a brief explanation of each enum value would help improve maintainability and readability in the long run.export enum CollectionAccess { + /** + * Only the owner can read and modify. + */ Private = 'PRIVATE', + /** + * Everyone can read, but only the owner can modify. + */ Public = 'PUBLIC', + /** + * Limited read access. Only specific roles or users can view content. + */ Restricted = 'RESTRICTED' }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/common/Header.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/MediaLibrary.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/analytics/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/resources.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/builder.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/seedUsers.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/graphql/src/builder.ts
🔇 Additional comments (20)
packages/prisma/src/data/seedUsers.ts (1)
20-20: Ensure consistent usage of the new featurePreview property.
By setting featurePreview: true, the standard user is implicitly granted early access to upcoming or experimental features. Confirm that the rest of the codebase checks this field properly and gracefully handles scenarios where the preview is inactive. Consider adding unit tests or integration tests to validate that the feature preview logic is correctly enforced.
packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts (1)
29-29: Parameter added successfully; ensure alignment with database defaults.
The optional featurePreview parameter allows for flexibility in user creation. Confirm that the corresponding database field defaults to false or another sensible default if not provided. This will help avoid unexpected access to preview features when a user record is inserted without an explicit setting.
packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts (2)
1-2: Good use of imports for Enum support.
The imports are consistent with the rest of this codebase.
4-6: Enum definition looks good.
Using Object.values(DB.CollectionAccess) ensures consistency with the Prisma-defined enum. This approach keeps the GraphQL schema in sync with your database layer.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/MediaLibrary.tsx (2)
1-3: Imports and i18n integration look correct.
These imports align with your established patterns for using the design system and translations.
4-16: Functional component implementation is clear and straightforward.
The MediaLibrary component effectively displays a heading and notification message. This is a good starting point for future enhancements (e.g., hooking up actual media).
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx (1)
1-3: Imports and structure are consistent.
It’s good practice to keep related components in the same directory for organization.
packages/graphql/src/index.ts (1)
13-13: Schema import inclusion is correct.
Importing ./schema/resource.js ensures the new CollectionAccess enum is integrated into the overall GraphQL schema.
apps/frontend-manage/src/pages/resources.tsx (2)
7-22: Overall page layout and structure look good
The ResourcesPage effectively groups the media library and answer collections under one layout. This separation improves the maintainability of the resource-management interface.
24-30: Confirm i18n fallback behavior
Ensure that if the locale is not found under @klicker-uzh/i18n/messages, the application gracefully falls back to a default locale or handles the missing messages without breaking.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx (1)
33-35: Test coverage for the creation form
When creationOpen is true, the AnswerCollectionCreation component is rendered. Please ensure that you have or plan to include unit tests and integration tests verifying form submission, validation, and state handling.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (2)
23-36: Validation schema is well-defined
The Yup schema effectively validates required fields, including a minimum of two entries for entries. This is a good practice for data integrity.
133-136: Ensure consistent usage of the onClose handler
The “Cancel” button calls the onClose prop, which closes the form. Check that any upstream code controlling modals or states also cleans up properly when this callback is invoked.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/common/Header.tsx (1)
51-57: Ensure navigation consistency across new routes.
By adding a new navigation item for "/resources", you are extending your existing navigation structure. Confirm that existing references and internal routing for "resources" are consistently used throughout the app and that no conflicting paths or route definitions exist.
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
785-785: Confirm the new key's usage.
You added 'resources': 'Resources'. Ensure you reference t('manage.general.resources') consistently everywhere relevant to avoid confusion or fallback to untranslated strings.
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-783: Approve short keyword.
The new key 'resources': 'Ressourcen' is succinct and fits your design.
1808-1838: Check for alignment with the English localization.
All newly added keys in the German section closely mirror the English translations. Verify that any key usage in code is appropriately referencing these paths, ensuring no mismatch or fallback.
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (2)
221-225: LGTM! The CollectionAccess enum is well-defined.
The enum follows GraphQL naming conventions and provides clear, distinct access levels that align with common access control patterns.
221-225: Verify the integration with collection management types.
The enum CollectionAccess is defined but not referenced by any types, inputs, or mutations in the current schema. Ensure that the collection management functionality is fully implemented.
Run the following script to verify the integration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to find references to the CollectionAccess enum.
Let me try searching without file type restriction since GraphQL files are not recognized.
Let me try one more search to find collection-related types with a simpler pattern.
Based on the search results from the previous scripts, I can now provide a final response:
The CollectionAccess enum is properly integrated with the collection management functionality
The enum is actively used in:
- The Prisma schema for the
AnswerCollectionmodel with a default value of PRIVATE - The GraphQL schema where it's exposed through a builder.enumType
- The frontend components for collection creation and management
- Database migrations that set up the collection access control system
The integration includes:
- Access control relationships in the database schema (accessRequested, accessGranted)
- Default access levels for new collections
- User interface components that utilize the enum for collection access management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for collection-related types and mutations that should use the CollectionAccess enum.
# Test 1: Search for collection-related types that should use the enum
echo "Searching for collection-related types..."
rg -A 5 "type.*Collection.*{"
# Test 2: Search for collection-related inputs that should use the enum
echo "Searching for collection-related inputs..."
rg -A 5 "input.*Collection.*{"
# Test 3: Search for collection-related mutations that should use the enum
echo "Searching for collection mutations..."
rg -A 5 "mutation.*Collection.*\("
Length of output: 66117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CollectionAccess enum references in the schema
echo "Searching for CollectionAccess references..."
rg -t graphql "CollectionAccess" --context 5
# Search for collection-related types and fields
echo "Searching for collection types and fields..."
rg -t graphql "type.*Collection|input.*Collection|field.*Collection" --context 5
Length of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CollectionAccess enum references
echo "Searching for CollectionAccess references..."
rg "CollectionAccess" --context 5
# Search for collection-related types and fields
echo "Searching for collection types and fields..."
rg "type\s+\w*Collection|\w*Collection\s*{|input\s+\w*Collection" --context 5
Length of output: 16427
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for collection types in GraphQL schema
echo "Searching for collection types..."
rg "type.*Collection|input.*Collection" packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql --context 5
Length of output: 173
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
2426-2455: Verify access control implementation.
The introduction of CollectionAccess enum suggests a granular access control system. Let's verify the implementation of these access levels across the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (3)
41-114: Consider making the access field width responsive.The hardcoded width of 40 units (
w-40) on the access field select trigger might not be optimal for all screen sizes.Consider using a responsive width or min-width:
- className={{ select: { trigger: 'h-9 w-40' } }} + className={{ select: { trigger: 'h-9 min-w-[10rem] w-auto' } }}
115-169: Enhance accessibility for dynamic form controls.The remove button for entries lacks proper accessibility attributes.
Add an aria-label to the remove button:
<Button onClick={() => remove(index)} data={{ cy: `remove-response-entry-${index}` }} + aria-label={t('manage.resources.removeEntry', { index: index + 1 })} className={{ root: 'flex h-9 w-9 items-center justify-center self-end border-red-600', }} >
50-53: Implement the submission logic for the form.The form submission logic is currently a placeholder with a TODO comment.
Would you like me to help implement the submission logic or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
apps/auth/package.json(1 hunks)apps/backend-docker/package.json(1 hunks)apps/docs/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-control/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-pwa/package.json(1 hunks)apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json(1 hunks)apps/func-response-processor/package.json(1 hunks)apps/office-addin/package.json(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)packages/markdown/package.json(1 hunks)packages/shared-components/package.json(1 hunks)packages/transactional/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- apps/auth/package.json
- packages/transactional/package.json
- apps/frontend-manage/package.json
- apps/backend-docker/package.json
- apps/frontend-control/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-783: LGTM!
The German translation "Ressourcen" for the resources navigation item is accurate and appropriately placed in the management section.
1808-1844: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive translations.
The new resources section provides high-quality German translations with:
- Clear and natural language choices
- Comprehensive coverage of UI elements and tooltips
- Consistent terminology
- Helpful user guidance for both media library and answer collections features
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (1)
1-40: Form setup looks good!
The form initialization and validation schema are well-structured with:
- Proper form validation using Yup
- Comprehensive validation rules for all fields
- Internationalization support for validation messages
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
1796-1832: Translations are complete and well-structured!
The new 'resources' section includes all necessary translations for the answer collections feature with clear and user-friendly messages.
apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json (1)
19-19: Verify the design system update impact.
The update to @uzh-bf/[email protected] is consistent across multiple packages. Since this is an alpha version:
- Ensure this version has been tested with the Azure Functions runtime
- Verify that all dependent components render correctly
✅ Verification successful
Design system version is consistently updated across all packages
The version 3.0.0-alpha.37 of @uzh-bf/design-system is consistently used across all 12 packages in the repository, including both apps and shared packages. This consistent versioning suggests a coordinated update and reduces the risk of version conflicts.
- All Azure Functions apps (
func-incoming-responses,func-response-processor) use the same version - Frontend applications and shared packages are aligned to the same version
- No mixed versions were found that could cause compatibility issues
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this version is consistently used across all package.json files
fd package.json$ | xargs grep -l "@uzh-bf/design-system"
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the version of @uzh-bf/design-system in all package.json files
fd package.json$ | xargs grep "@uzh-bf/design-system"
Length of output: 1020
apps/func-response-processor/package.json (1)
21-21: LGTM! Consistent with other function apps.
The design system version update matches other packages and maintains consistency across the codebase.
apps/docs/package.json (1)
25-25: Verify documentation site rendering with new design system version.
Since the documentation site heavily relies on the design system for styling and components:
- Ensure all documentation pages render correctly
- Verify that no visual regressions are introduced
packages/shared-components/package.json (1)
42-42: Verify impact of design system update
The update from 3.0.0-alpha.36 to 3.0.0-alpha.37 is a pre-release version change. Since this is an alpha version, please ensure:
- All packages are using the same version
- No breaking changes were introduced
✅ Verification successful
Design system version is consistent across all packages
All package.json files in the repository are using the same version 3.0.0-alpha.37 of @uzh-bf/design-system. Let's verify if there are any breaking changes by checking the commit history of the design system package.
Design system version update appears safe to proceed
The version consistency check shows that all packages are using the same version 3.0.0-alpha.37 of @uzh-bf/design-system. While the changelog search shows various bug fixes and improvements, none of them indicate breaking changes related to the design system package. The changes appear to be internal bug fixes and improvements to the application itself rather than the design system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check version consistency across all package.json files
echo "Checking @uzh-bf/design-system version consistency..."
fd package.json | xargs grep -l "@uzh-bf/design-system" | xargs cat | grep "@uzh-bf/design-system"
Length of output: 777
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for breaking changes in package.json and changelog
echo "Checking for breaking changes..."
rg -i "break" -C2 CHANGELOG.md || true
Length of output: 4936
packages/markdown/package.json (1)
43-43: LGTM: Version consistent with shared-components
The design system version update is consistent with other packages.
apps/frontend-pwa/package.json (1)
29-29: Consider PWA impact of design system update
The design system version is consistent with other packages. However, since this is a PWA:
- Test the UI changes thoroughly on mobile devices
- Verify that the PWA functionality remains intact after the update
Consider implementing a canary release strategy for PWA updates to minimize the impact of potential breaking changes in alpha versions.
apps/office-addin/package.json (1)
6-6: Verify compatibility with the design system update.
The update of @uzh-bf/design-system to version 3.0.0-alpha.37 looks good as it maintains consistency across the monorepo. However, since this is an alpha version update and the project targets IE 11, please ensure:
- Review the changelog for any breaking changes
- Verify IE 11 compatibility is maintained
Let's verify the changes in the design system package:
sjschlapbach
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (19)
packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (5)
112-120: Add JSDoc for clarity
It may help future maintainers if you document each property of theAnswerCollectiontype—especially whataccess,description, andownerShortnamerepresent in context.
122-126: Extend documentation for entry properties
Likewise, consider adding a brief description of thevaluefield inAnswerCollectionEntryto clarify appropriate usage and expected format.
276-280: Add inline comments or docstrings for enum values
Providing a short explanation for each enum member (e.g.,Private,Public,Restricted) can be beneficial. It improves readability in large codebases and ensures everyone uses the correct enum values.
1102-1102: Consider making the return type non-null
IfcreateAnswerCollectionis guaranteed to produce anAnswerCollectionon successful calls, consider using a non-nullable return type. Otherwise, document under what conditions it can returnnull.
1276-1281: Validate required inputs
Consider adding validation checks to ensure thatname,description,access, andanswersmeet certain criteria (e.g., non-empty strings, arrays with at least one element, etc.).apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionErrorToast.tsx (1)
11-11: Potential fallback translations.
Consider providing a fallback string in casemanage.resources.collectionCreationErroris missing or not loaded bynext-intl.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionSuccessToast.tsx (1)
11-11: Consider fallback strings for translations.
As with the error toast, providing a fallback string (e.g.,'Collection creation succeeded') may be beneficial.packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
4-17: Input validation check recommended.
Although the code checks for existing collections, consider additional validation (e.g., ensuringnameis a valid string length,descriptionis not empty if required).packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts (2)
19-22: Add JSDoc documentation for the interface.Consider adding documentation to explain the purpose of extending the DB model and the significance of the additional fields.
+/** + * Extends the base AnswerCollection model with additional fields for API responses + * @property entries - Collection of answer entries + * @property ownerShortname - Optional shortname of the collection owner + */ interface IAnswerCollection extends DB.AnswerCollection { entries: DB.AnswerCollectionEntry[] ownerShortname?: string }
26-35: Consider adding field validation rules.The implementation exposes fields directly without additional validation. Consider adding validation rules for fields like
name(e.g., length constraints) anddescription.export const AnswerCollection = AnswerCollectionRef.implement({ fields: (t) => ({ id: t.exposeInt('id'), - name: t.exposeString('name'), + name: t.string({ + resolve: (parent) => parent.name, + validate: { minLength: 3, maxLength: 100 } + }), access: t.expose('access', { type: CollectionAccess }), - description: t.exposeString('description'), + description: t.string({ + resolve: (parent) => parent.description, + validate: { maxLength: 500 } + }), entries: t.expose('entries', { type: [AnswerCollectionEntryRef] }), ownerShortname: t.exposeString('ownerShortname', { nullable: true }), }), })apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx (2)
12-15: Consider consolidating UI state.Multiple boolean states could be consolidated into a single state machine for better state management.
- const [creationOpen, setCreationOpen] = useState(false) - const [browsingOpen, setBrowsingOpen] = useState(false) - const [successToast, setSuccessToast] = useState(false) - const [errorToast, setErrorToast] = useState(false) + const [uiState, setUiState] = useState<{ + view: 'default' | 'creation' | 'browsing'; + toast: 'none' | 'success' | 'error'; + }>({ + view: 'default', + toast: 'none', + })
13-13: Implement browsing shared collections functionality.The TODO comment indicates missing functionality for browsing shared collections.
Would you like me to help implement the browsing functionality or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101133931_answer_collections/migration.sql (2)
4-16: Consider adding constraints to text fields and verify nullable ownerId.A few suggestions for the table definition:
- Consider adding length constraints to
nameanddescriptionTEXT fields to prevent excessive data storage.- Verify if
ownerIdshould be nullable, as every collection might need an owner for accountability.CREATE TABLE "AnswerCollection" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, - "name" TEXT NOT NULL, - "description" TEXT NOT NULL, + "name" VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, + "description" TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (length(description) <= 2000), "version" INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1, "access" "CollectionAccess" NOT NULL DEFAULT 'PRIVATE', - "ownerId" UUID, + "ownerId" UUID NOT NULL, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, "updatedAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT "AnswerCollection_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );
18-25: Consider adding constraint to value text field.To prevent excessive data storage, consider adding a length constraint to the
valueTEXT field.CREATE TABLE "AnswerCollectionEntry" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, - "value" TEXT NOT NULL, + "value" TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (length(value) <= 1000), "collectionId" INTEGER NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT "AnswerCollectionEntry_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (4)
1-32: Consider strengthening the type definition.The type definition could be more strict:
- Make optional fields required since they have validation
- Consider using a union type for
CollectionAccessinstead of the enum directlytype AnswerCollectionFormValues = { - name?: string + name: string - access: CollectionAccess + access: 'PUBLIC' | 'PRIVATE' | 'RESTRICTED' - description?: string + description: string - entries: { value?: string }[] + entries: { value: string }[] }
46-59: Document the minimum entries requirement.The validation schema enforces a minimum of 2 entries, but the reason for this requirement is not documented. Consider:
- Adding a code comment explaining why 2 entries are required
- Making this value configurable if it's a business rule that might change
entries: Yup.array() .of( Yup.object().shape({ value: Yup.string().required(t('manage.resources.valueRequired')), }) ) + // Minimum of 2 entries required to ensure meaningful collections .min(2, t('manage.resources.minTwoEntriesRequired')),
61-86: Consider using constants for initial values.Extract initial values to named constants for better maintainability:
+const INITIAL_ENTRY = { value: undefined }; +const INITIAL_FORM_VALUES: AnswerCollectionFormValues = { + name: undefined, + access: CollectionAccess.Private, + description: undefined, + entries: [INITIAL_ENTRY, INITIAL_ENTRY], +}; <Formik - initialValues={{ - name: undefined, - access: CollectionAccess.Private, - description: undefined, - entries: [{ value: undefined }, { value: undefined }], - }} + initialValues={INITIAL_FORM_VALUES}
87-229: Improve consistency of data-cy attributes.The data-cy attributes could be more consistent:
- Some use kebab-case (e.g., 'answer-collection-name')
- Others use camelCase (e.g., 'responseEntry')
- Some buttons lack data-cy attributes
- data={{ cy: `response-entry-${index}` }} + data={{ cy: `answer-collection-entry-${index}` }}Also consider adding data-cy attributes to the access level options for better testability.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
886-900: Review ID exposure in public APIUsing sequential integers as public IDs could expose information about the system's data volume and make it vulnerable to enumeration attacks.
Consider using:
- UUIDs or other non-sequential identifiers
- Separate internal and external IDs
- Access control checks before exposing IDs
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionErrorToast.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionSuccessToast.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MCreateAnswerCollection.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.ts(6 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/client.json(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/server.json(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101133931_answer_collections/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma
🔇 Additional comments (32)
packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (2)
4251-4251: Implementation matches the new mutation
All fields in CreateAnswerCollectionDocument align correctly with the schema changes, so this looks good to me.
2913-2922: Verify usage of the new mutation input
Ensure that all call sites correctly supply name, description, and a non-empty list of answers.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the actual usage of this mutation to verify the call sites.
All call sites correctly supply the required fields
Based on the search results, I found the only usage of the CreateAnswerCollectionMutation in apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx. The mutation is called with all the required fields:
nameis provided fromvalues.namewhich is required by the Yup validation schemadescriptionis provided fromvalues.descriptionwhich is required by the Yup validation schemaaccessis provided fromvalues.accesswhich is required by the Yup validation schemaanswersis provided as a non-empty array by mappingvalues.entries.map((entry) => entry.value!)
The validation schema ensures all required fields are present before the mutation can be executed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searches the codebase for calls to the newly declared 'CreateAnswerCollectionMutation' type
# to ensure that the correct arguments are passed.
rg -A 5 'CreateAnswerCollectionMutation'
Length of output: 33723
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of createAnswerCollection mutation or its variables
rg -A 5 'createAnswerCollection|CreateAnswerCollectionMutation|CreateAnswerCollectionMutationVariables'
Length of output: 47805
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionErrorToast.tsx (4)
1-3: Imports and hooks usage look good.
The usage of Toast from @uzh-bf/design-system and useTranslations from next-intl follows recommended practices.
4-10: Prop definitions are clear and concise.
The prop shapes (open and setOpen) are straightforward, promoting maintainability.
13-25: Toast configuration is well-structured.
The toast properly handles closing, duration, and styling. Handling errors with a 10-second duration is suitable for user awareness.
27-27: Export statement is succinct.
Clean default export. No issues found.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CollectionSuccessToast.tsx (4)
1-3: Imports and hooks usage look good.
Same approach as CollectionErrorToast, consistent with the design system usage.
4-10: Clear prop definitions.
The function signature and prop typing align well, ensuring correct usage.
13-25: Toast usage and success message.
The 4-second duration is reasonable for a success alert. The dismissible flag and openExternal mechanism are well-suited for user control.
27-27: Clean default export.
No concerns here.
packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (2)
32-58: Bulk entries creation logic is clear.
Mapping answers into entries is straightforward. Be mindful of potential large input arrays or concurrency issues.
59-59: Return shape clarity.
Appending ownerShortname to the returned object is helpful for front-end use. Confirm the presence of owner?.shortname in all data scenarios.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (2)
14-14: Service import organization.
The import of ResourcesService here is consistent with the existing service import pattern.
1142-1154: New mutation definition is correct and consistent.
The createAnswerCollection mutation uses robust argument definitions and calls the appropriate service function. Matches the established access control pattern.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MCreateAnswerCollection.graphql (1)
1-23: LGTM! Well-structured GraphQL mutation.
The mutation is well-defined with:
- Proper input validation (all required fields marked with !)
- Comprehensive return type including essential fields
- Clear naming conventions
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101133931_answer_collections/migration.sql (4)
1-2: LGTM: Enum definition is clear and appropriate.
The CollectionAccess enum provides suitable access control levels (PUBLIC, PRIVATE, RESTRICTED) for managing answer collections.
27-41: LGTM: Junction tables are well structured.
The junction tables _answerCollectionAccessRequested and _answerCollectionShared are properly designed with composite primary keys for managing many-to-many relationships between collections and users.
43-53: LGTM: Index choices are appropriate.
The indexes are well-chosen:
- Unique constraint on (ownerId, name) prevents duplicate collection names per owner
- Unique constraint on (collectionId, value) prevents duplicate entries in a collection
- Regular indexes on junction tables optimize join performance
58-71: LGTM: Cascade behavior is appropriate for these relationships.
The CASCADE behavior on delete/update is correct for:
- AnswerCollectionEntry -> AnswerCollection
- Junction tables -> AnswerCollection
- Junction tables -> User
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx (1)
34-44: LGTM: Component interface is well designed.
The component has:
- Clear prop types for callbacks
- Good use of translations for i18n
- Proper setup of GraphQL mutation
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (1)
15-15: LGTM: Operation hash is properly added.
The CreateAnswerCollection operation is correctly added to the client operations map with its corresponding hash value.
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (3)
85-92: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The AnswerCollection type has a good balance of required and optional fields, with proper relationships to its entries.
94-97: LGTM! Concise and focused type definition.
The AnswerCollectionEntry type contains exactly what's needed - an ID for referencing and a value for the answer content.
235-239: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive access control levels.
The CollectionAccess enum provides a logical progression of access levels from public to private.
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
Line range hint 785-1836: LGTM! Comprehensive and user-friendly translations.
The translations provide clear explanations and helpful tooltips for all aspects of answer collections, with well-written error messages and access level descriptions.
packages/graphql/src/public/server.json (1)
15-15: LGTM! Well-defined mutation with appropriate fields.
The CreateAnswerCollection mutation has a clear contract with required inputs and comprehensive return type.
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-783: LGTM: Resources key added correctly
The translation key for "Ressourcen" is properly placed within the manage.general section.
1808-1848: LGTM: Comprehensive translations for new resources section
The new resources section provides complete German translations for:
- Media Library (placeholder for future implementation)
- Answer Collections feature with all necessary UI elements, tooltips, and validation messages
- Clear descriptions of different access levels (PUBLIC, PRIVATE, RESTRICTED)
The translations are well-written and maintain consistency with the existing localization style.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (4)
2582-2611: Add descriptions to improve API documentation.
The CollectionAccess enum and its values lack descriptions. Since this enum controls access levels, clear documentation is crucial for API consumers.
823-934: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add descriptions to improve API documentation
The AnswerCollection type and its fields lack descriptions. Clear documentation is crucial for API consumers to understand the purpose and usage of each field.
Add descriptions like this:
{
"kind": "OBJECT",
"name": "AnswerCollection",
- "description": null,
+ "description": "Represents a collection of answers that can be shared with different access levels",
"fields": [
{
"name": "access",
- "description": null,
+ "description": "Access level controlling who can view this collection",
...
},
{
"name": "description",
- "description": null,
+ "description": "Detailed description of what this collection contains",
...
}
// Add descriptions for other fields similarly
]
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
846-860: Consider adding validation constraints for string fields
The name and description fields are defined as non-null strings without any length or content constraints. Consider adding validation to ensure data quality.
Run this script to check if there are any validation constraints defined elsewhere:
Also applies to: 902-916
11724-11808: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add mutation description and improve input validation
The mutation lacks a description and input validation. Consider:
- Adding a clear description of the mutation's purpose and behavior
- Validating the answers array (e.g., non-empty, max length)
- Adding rate limiting hints via custom directives
Add descriptions and validation like this:
{
"name": "createAnswerCollection",
- "description": null,
+ "description": "Creates a new answer collection with the specified access level and content",
"args": [
{
"name": "answers",
- "description": null,
+ "description": "List of answers to include in the collection. Must not be empty.",
...
}
// Add descriptions for other args similarly
]
}Run this script to check for existing rate limiting or validation:
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20250101133931_answer_collections/migration.sql
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx (2)
5-5: Remove the empty object destructuring in the function signature.
Since no properties are explicitly destructured, it’s unnecessary to include{}in the parameter.-function SharedAnswerCollectionList({}: { +function SharedAnswerCollectionList({ sharedCollections?: AnswerCollection[] requestedCollections?: AnswerCollection[] loading: boolean }) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 5-5: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
12-13: Implement the placeholder functionality.
There’s a TODO comment indicating that the shared answer collection list content will be added. Consider addressing this sooner to avoid forgetting the planned feature.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionCollapsible.tsx (1)
13-13: Make the default open state configurable.
Depending on UX requirements, consider allowing a prop (e.g.,defaultOpen?: boolean) to control the initial expand/collapse state, improving flexibility across different use cases.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionList.tsx (2)
8-8: Schedule or implement the editing mechanism.
A TODO suggests adding an editing feature. Plan or implement it soon to avoid merging incomplete functionality without a clear timeline.
14-16: Validate loading vs. collections usage.
Ensure theloadingstate properly guards or indicates whencollectionsmight be undefined or still loading. For clarity, you might want to skip renderingcollectionsentirely whenloadingis true.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionItem.tsx (2)
25-44: Consider externalizing or reusing the access map.
If multiple components will rely on mappingCollectionAccessto UI representations, refactor this map into a shared utility to avoid duplicating logic.
46-85: Potential UX improvement for read-only mode.
Wheneditableis false, consider clarifying the user flow for viewing shared content, possibly using a tooltip or additional text for consistency with the displayed “VIEW SHARED CONTENT” button text.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx (1)
1-33: Handle loading and error states for better user experience.
Currently, the UI simply destructuresdataandloadingfrom the query without handling errors or providing a fallback loader/spinner. Consider explicitly handlingerrorusinguseQueryor showing a loading indicator to enhance user feedback.function AnswerCollections() { const t = useTranslations() - const { data, loading } = useQuery(GetAnswerCollectionsDocument) + const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(GetAnswerCollectionsDocument) if (loading) { + return <div>Loading collections...</div> } + if (error) { + return <div>Error loading collections: {error.message}</div> + }packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
111-113: Consider clarifying null returns for missing users.
In GraphQL, returningnullfor unauthorized or non-existent users is common, but a more specific error can help the client distinguish between an actual permission problem and a missing user. If this is intentional, it’s fine; otherwise, consider a custom exception or a user-friendly message.packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (2)
823-930: Add descriptions and consider field constraints.The new types lack descriptions and field-level documentation. Additionally:
- Consider making
ownerShortnamerequired for proper access control.- Consider adding validation constraints (e.g., min/max length) for string fields like
name,description, andvalue.Example improvements:
{ "kind": "OBJECT", "name": "AnswerCollection", - "description": null, + "description": "Represents a collection of answers that can be shared between users", "fields": [ { "name": "name", - "description": null, + "description": "The name of the collection (1-100 characters)", ... }, { "name": "ownerShortname", "type": { - "kind": "SCALAR", + "kind": "NON_NULL", "name": "String", ... }, ... } ] }Also applies to: 931-974
24132-24215: Clarify collection types and add pagination.The
UserAnswerCollectionstype needs:
- Clear descriptions distinguishing between collection types
- Pagination support for each collection list
- Consider making lists nullable if they can be empty
Example improvements:
{ "kind": "OBJECT", "name": "UserAnswerCollections", - "description": null, + "description": "Groups different types of answer collections accessible to a user", "fields": [ { "name": "answerCollections", - "description": null, + "description": "Collections owned by the user", ... }, { "name": "requestedCollections", - "description": null, + "description": "Collections the user has requested access to", ... }, { "name": "sharedCollections", - "description": null, + "description": "Collections shared with the user by others", ... } ] }packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (2)
276-280: Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the enum values.The
CollectionAccessenum is well-defined with appropriate values. Consider adding documentation to clarify the implications of each access level.+/** + * Access levels for answer collections + * PRIVATE - Only visible to the owner + * PUBLIC - Visible to all users + * RESTRICTED - Visible to specific users or groups + */ export enum CollectionAccess { Private = 'PRIVATE', Public = 'PUBLIC', Restricted = 'RESTRICTED' }
1102-1102: Consider enhancing error handling for GraphQL operations.For robust error handling:
- Define specific error types for common failure cases (e.g., duplicate names, invalid access levels).
- Implement union types with error variants for mutation responses.
- Add error-specific fields in the response types.
This will help clients handle errors more effectively.
Example implementation:
type CreateAnswerCollectionResponse = { __typename?: 'CreateAnswerCollectionResponse'; collection?: Maybe<AnswerCollection>; error?: Maybe<{ code: 'DUPLICATE_NAME' | 'INVALID_ACCESS' | 'UNAUTHORIZED'; message: string; }>; };Also applies to: 2207-2207
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionCollapsible.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionItem.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollectionList.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(5 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.ts(10 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/client.json(2 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(5 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/server.json(2 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/query.ts(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/CreateAddCollection.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx
[error] 5-5: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clean enum definition maintaining type safety
The CollectionAccess enum is well-defined by reusing values from Prisma, ensuring type consistency between the GraphQL schema and database layer.
19-38: Clarify ownership requirements
The ownerShortname is marked as nullable, which could lead to ownership ambiguity. Consider:
- Making it required for certain access levels (e.g., RESTRICTED)
- Adding documentation about when it can be null
- Adding ownership validation in the resolvers
Run this script to analyze ownership handling:
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx (1)
14-20: Leverage the props or remove them if unneeded.
Currently, sharedCollections, requestedCollections, and loading are declared but not used within the component. Either use them to render the appropriate UI or remove if unneeded.
packages/graphql/src/schema/query.ts (1)
816-823: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new query.
The newly introduced getAnswerCollections query appears logically consistent, but please confirm that unit or integration tests are added to verify both successful retrievals and expected null/error returns when the user context is invalid.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql (1)
1-33: Query structure looks consistent and complete.
The fields fetched (e.g., answerCollections, sharedCollections, requestedCollections) and their subfields align well with the new schema. This helps ensure all data is acquired in a single call.
packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
28-30: Avoid silent null returns when detecting duplicate names.
Returning null may not provide enough client feedback if a collection with the same name already exists. Consider throwing an error or returning a more explicit message.
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (1)
15-15: LGTM! The new methods are correctly added.
The new methods CreateAnswerCollection and GetAnswerCollections are properly added with their corresponding hash values, maintaining alphabetical order in the JSON structure.
Also applies to: 112-112
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (2)
85-92: LGTM! The new types are well-structured.
The new types are properly defined with appropriate fields and relationships:
AnswerCollectionincludes essential fields for managing collectionsAnswerCollectionEntryprovides a simple structure for answer valuesCollectionAccessenum defines clear access levelsUserAnswerCollectionsproperly separates different collection types
Also applies to: 94-97, 235-239, 1647-1651
1011-1011: LGTM! The operations are correctly defined.
The new operations are properly integrated:
- Mutation
createAnswerCollectionwith required parameters - Query
getAnswerCollectionsreturning the appropriate type
Also applies to: 1420-1420
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
1796-1842: LGTM! The translations are comprehensive and well-structured.
The new translations under the resources section:
- Are logically organized and grouped
- Cover all UI elements and user interactions
- Include clear error messages and tooltips
- Follow consistent naming patterns
- Provide informative descriptions for different access levels
packages/graphql/src/public/server.json (2)
15-15: LGTM! CreateAnswerCollection mutation is well-structured.
The mutation includes all necessary fields for creating an answer collection and returns appropriate response data including collection details and entries.
112-112: LGTM! GetAnswerCollections query is well-designed.
The query effectively separates collections into owned, shared and requested categories, with appropriate fields returned for each type.
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-783: LGTM! Resources section is well-structured.
The new resources key is properly integrated into the existing manage section.
Line range hint 808-1854: LGTM! Translations are comprehensive and well-written.
The German translations for answer collections and media library features are complete, grammatically correct, and maintain consistent style. All UI elements, tooltips, and error messages are properly covered.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
2578-2607: Add descriptions to improve API documentation.
The CollectionAccess enum and its values still lack descriptions, which are crucial for API consumers.
packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (3)
112-126: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.
The type definitions for AnswerCollection and AnswerCollectionEntry are well-designed with appropriate nullable fields and scalar types.
1102-1102: LGTM! Well-defined GraphQL operations.
The mutation and query operations are properly integrated with appropriate argument types and return values.
Also applies to: 1276-1281, 2207-2207
Line range hint 4264-4361: LGTM! Comprehensive GraphQL document definitions.
The document definitions are well-structured with proper typing and complete field selections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
11732-11816: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance input validation and error handling
The mutation needs better input validation and error handling.
Additionally, consider adding input validation for:
name: Add length constraints and character restrictionsdescription: Add length constraintsanswers: Add size limits for the array{ "name": "name", "description": null, + "description": "Collection name (1-100 characters, alphanumeric and spaces only)", "type": { "kind": "NON_NULL", "name": null, "ofType": { "kind": "SCALAR", "name": "String", "ofType": null } }, + "directives": [ + { + "name": "constraint", + "args": { + "minLength": 1, + "maxLength": 100, + "pattern": "^[\\w\\s-]+$" + } + } + ]
🧹 Nitpick comments (21)
packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (3)
112-128: Consider potential large data handling forentries
Storing large arrays directly inentriesmay lead to performance overheads when collections grow. Consider pagination, lazy loading, or a separate query if the data set can be large.
2217-2217: Optional caching or pagination forgetAnswerCollections
Depending on usage frequency and size, caching or pagination might help reduce response times and server load.
3773-3774: Consider query parameters
GetAnswerCollectionsQueryVariablesis empty. In the future, you may want parameters for pagination or filtering to handle large datasets.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCollapsible.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider adding accessibility attributes to the button.Although you’re correctly using a
<Button>element for toggling the content, consider addingaria-expandedor other relevant accessibility attributes to better support assistive technologies.
6-13: Consider using a named interface or type for the component props.While the inline type definition is perfectly valid, adding a named interface (e.g.,
AnswerCollectionCollapsibleProps) can improve readability and maintainability if the props grow in the future.-function AnswerCollectionCollapsible({ - title, - children, -}: { - title: string - children: React.ReactNode -}) { +interface AnswerCollectionCollapsibleProps { + title: string; + children: React.ReactNode; +} + +function AnswerCollectionCollapsible({ + title, + children, +}: AnswerCollectionCollapsibleProps) {apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionAccessSelection.tsx (1)
1-5: Optional: group import statements for readability.You could group FontAwesome imports together. This is purely stylistic and can be skipped if you prefer separating them.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionItem.tsx (3)
26-45: Potential reuse ofcollectionAccessMap.
If other components (e.g. listings, detail views) also need consistent UI icons forCollectionAccess, consider refactoring this map into a shared utility or config to prevent duplication and mismatches across the codebase.
56-77: Conditional rendering for entries is clear.
Usingcollection.entries !== undefined && collection.entries !== nullis fine. However, consider a simpler truthy check likecollection.entries?.lengthif the schema guarantees it’s eithernullor an array.- {typeof collection.entries !== 'undefined' && collection.entries !== null ? ( + {collection.entries?.length ? (
78-85: Enhance clarity for non-editable state.
Displaying “VIEW SHARED CONTENT” is good. You could also consider an info icon or a tooltip to explain why it's read-only, especially if the end user expects to edit.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionMetaForm.tsx (1)
75-84: Check the disabled logic for private and restricted access.
Disabling certain options is fine if the collection has shared users. But if users need to remove those shared users first, consider providing inline guidance or a link to manage access.packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql (1)
15-25: Shared collections are well-defined.
Retrieving theownerShortnamehelps differentiate owners’ data in the UI. Consider also exposing any relevant permission details if needed.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx (1)
12-19: Implement the shared answer collection listThe component currently renders a placeholder "LIST" text and has a TODO comment. Consider implementing:
- Loading state handling
- Empty state handling
- List rendering for both shared and requested collections
- Error boundaries
Would you like me to help implement this component with proper error handling and loading states?
packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts (1)
19-23: Consider making optional fields non-nullable in the interfaceThe interface
IAnswerCollectionuses optional fields with undefined. Consider using non-nullable types with explicit null:interface IAnswerCollection extends DB.AnswerCollection { - entries?: DB.AnswerCollectionEntry[] - ownerShortname?: string - numSharedUsers?: number + entries: DB.AnswerCollectionEntry[] | null + ownerShortname: string | null + numSharedUsers: number | null }packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (2)
168-180: Simplify access control logicThe access control logic is complex and could be simplified using a lookup table or helper function:
+const ACCESS_RESTRICTIONS = { + [DB.CollectionAccess.PRIVATE]: ['PUBLIC', 'RESTRICTED'], + [DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED]: ['PUBLIC'], + [DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC]: [], +} + +function isAccessChangeAllowed(currentAccess: DB.CollectionAccess, newAccess: DB.CollectionAccess): boolean { + return !ACCESS_RESTRICTIONS[newAccess]?.includes(currentAccess) +} - if ( - (numSharedUsers > 0 && - (collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED || - collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC) && - access === DB.CollectionAccess.PRIVATE) || - (numSharedUsers > 0 && - collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC && - access === DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED) - ) { + if (numSharedUsers > 0 && !isAccessChangeAllowed(collection.access, access)) { return null }
182-195: Add optimistic locking for concurrent modificationsThe update operation should include version-based concurrency control to prevent lost updates:
const updatedCollection = await ctx.prisma.answerCollection.update({ where: { id, + version: collection.version, // Add version field to schema }, data: { name: name ?? undefined, access: access ?? undefined, description: description ?? undefined, + version: { increment: 1 }, }, include: { entries: true, }, })packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (1)
Line range hint
809-811: Consider adding more details to the media library placeholder message.The placeholder message for the upcoming media library feature could be enhanced with more specific information about expected functionality and timeline.
- mediaLibraryAvailableSoon: - 'Bald wird hier Ihre Mediathek verfügbar sein und Ihnen ermöglichen, hochgeladene Ressourcen einzusehen.', + mediaLibraryAvailableSoon: + 'Bald wird hier Ihre Mediathek verfügbar sein und Ihnen ermöglichen, hochgeladene Ressourcen wie Bilder und Dokumente zu verwalten und in Ihre Fragen einzubinden.',packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (3)
823-942: Add descriptions to improve schema documentationThe
AnswerCollectiontype and its fields lack descriptions, which are crucial for API consumers. Consider adding meaningful descriptions to explain the purpose and usage of each field.
944-986: Consider using a more flexible type for entry valuesThe
valuefield inAnswerCollectionEntryis currently a non-null String. Consider using a more flexible type (like JSON or a union type) to support different answer formats (e.g., multiple choice, numeric, text).- "type": { - "kind": "NON_NULL", - "name": null, - "ofType": { - "kind": "SCALAR", - "name": "String", - "ofType": null - } - }, + "type": { + "kind": "NON_NULL", + "name": null, + "ofType": { + "kind": "SCALAR", + "name": "JSON", + "ofType": null + } + },
24209-24292: Add descriptions and total counts
- Add descriptions to explain the purpose of each collection type:
answerCollections: Collections owned by the userrequestedCollections: Collections the user has requested access tosharedCollections: Collections shared with the user
- Consider adding count fields for each collection type to support pagination and UI display without loading all entries.
"fields": [ + { + "name": "totalAnswerCollections", + "description": "Total number of collections owned by the user", + "type": { + "kind": "NON_NULL", + "name": null, + "ofType": { + "kind": "SCALAR", + "name": "Int", + "ofType": null + } + } + }, { "name": "answerCollections", - "description": null, + "description": "Collections owned by the user",packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2)
1798-1799: Consider using feature flags for the media libraryInstead of showing a "coming soon" message, consider using feature flags to completely hide the media library section until it's ready. This provides a cleaner user experience and avoids promising features that aren't yet available.
1820-1825: Enhance validation messages with specific requirementsThe validation messages could be more specific about the requirements:
nameRequired: Could specify any length or format requirementsminTwoEntriesRequired: Could explain why two entries are needed- nameRequired: 'Please enter a name for the answer collection.', + nameRequired: 'Please enter a name (3-50 characters) for the answer collection.', - minTwoEntriesRequired: - 'At least two answer entries are required to create an answer collection.', + minTwoEntriesRequired: + 'At least two answer entries are required to create a valid answer collection for selection questions.',
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionAccessSelection.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCollapsible.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionItem.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionList.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionMetaForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MModifyAnswerCollection.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(6 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.ts(14 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/client.json(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(6 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/server.json(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/AnswerCollections.tsx
- apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCreation.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx
[error] 5-5: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
🔇 Additional comments (48)
packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (9)
277-281: Enum naming consistency
The naming of CollectionAccess enum values aligns well with their intended meanings.
1103-1103: Enforce proper authorization on creation
Ensure that users who call createAnswerCollection have the necessary permissions to create new collections.
1278-1283: Validate createAnswerCollection inputs
Consider validating or sanitizing name, description, and each item in answers before storing them to guard against injection or excessive payloads.
2766-2771: Handle enormous lists gracefully
For UserAnswerCollections, consider limiting or paginating the arrays (answerCollections, requestedCollections, sharedCollections) to avoid large payloads.
2931-2936: Confirm client-side integrities
Ensure that front-end forms passing CreateAnswerCollectionMutationVariables supply valid data types and non-empty arrays for answers.
3474-3479: Graceful handling of optional fields
Confirm that partial updates do not overwrite existing fields incorrectly (e.g. leaving name or description empty).
4284-4284: Invalidate or update caches after creation
When using a GraphQL client (e.g., Apollo), ensure that CreateAnswerCollectionDocument triggers any necessary cache updates or re-fetches to keep the UI in sync.
4343-4343: Refresh cached data post-modification
After calling ModifyAnswerCollectionDocument, confirm that the local or remote store is updated correctly so the UI reflects changes promptly.
4382-4382: Check re-fetch strategy on getAnswerCollections
After creating or modifying collections, confirm that GetAnswerCollectionsDocument is re-fetched or revalidated to maintain consistency between client and server states.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionCollapsible.tsx (1)
15-31: Collapsible logic appears solid.
Your toggle mechanism is straightforward and user-friendly. The conditionally rendered children also looks good.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx (2)
7-15: Handle potential undefined collection properties.
If collection.name is missing or undefined, the modal’s title might break. Consider providing a fallback text in case the collection is incomplete.
19-37: Modal design is consistent.
The usage of Modal for editing and the success Toast reflect a good user experience. Keep an eye on potential accessibility concerns (e.g., focus traps) that are typically handled by the Modal component itself, but ensure you verify its correctness in your design system implementation.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionList.tsx (2)
8-9: TODO comment hints upcoming feature.
The in-file TODO indicates a plan to add an editing mechanism in a modal. Ensure that this corresponds with the newly introduced AnswerCollectionEditModal to keep features consistent.
19-40: Conditional rendering logic is clean and understandable.
Handling three states—loading, empty array, or populated—enhances clarity. This approach keeps the UI straightforward and maintainable.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionAccessSelection.tsx (1)
20-60: Select field implementation is well-structured.
Providing detailed label icons and text for each access level aligns with good UX. The component is clear in purpose and usage.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionItem.tsx (3)
17-23: Ensure type completeness for props.
The component props are well-defined. However, ensure that any additional props or default values are consistently handled.
49-55: Button styling is consistent with brand identity.
Your usage of basic and custom classes flexibly adjusts button styling. Just make sure this approach remains consistent with the rest of the application's design guidelines for uniformity.
87-92: Well-structured modal integration.
The modal’s open/close logic is straightforward and easy to maintain, promoting a clear user flow for editing.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionMetaForm.tsx (3)
39-49: Granular updates are well-implemented.
Providing only changed fields in the mutation is a clean approach. It reduces unnecessary updates in the system.
56-62: Comprehensive validation schema.
Requiring name, access, and description helps maintain data consistency. Be sure our translations handle all potential validation error messages.
105-112: Form submit button ensures user feedback.
Good job disabling the button and showing a loading state with isSubmitting; it improves the user experience and prevents duplicate submissions.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MModifyAnswerCollection.graphql (3)
1-6: Mutation variable design.
Your choice of optional parameters ($name, $access, $description) is flexible, enabling partial updates. Great for preventing overwriting existing fields when not needed.
7-12: Validate that backend resolvers handle null values gracefully.
When $name, $access, or $description are null, ensure the backend interprets them correctly (i.e., no undesired data wipes).
13-22: Return fields are sufficient for UI updates.
You include id, name, access, description, numSharedUsers, and entries, which should be enough data to refresh the client state and UI.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql (3)
1-3: Efficient grouping of queries.
Fetching all three categories (answerCollections, sharedCollections, and requestedCollections) within one query is beneficial for performance and reduces client round-trips.
4-14: Sufficient detail for user-owned collections.
Having id, name, access, description, numSharedUsers, and entries in the same payload helps the frontend render everything needed for managing the collection.
26-34: Queried fields for requested collections are appropriate.
This helps the client handle requests awaiting approval. If any additional metadata (e.g., reason for request) is needed, they can be included in future expansions.
packages/graphql/src/schema/resource.ts (1)
42-61: Consider implementing pagination for collection arrays
The arrays in UserAnswerCollections could benefit from pagination to handle large datasets efficiently.
packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
4-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and use transactions
The createAnswerCollection function should:
- Validate input parameters (e.g., name length, empty answers)
- Use transactions to ensure atomic operations
- Handle potential database errors explicitly
Example implementation:
export async function createAnswerCollection(
{
name,
access,
description,
answers,
}: {
name: string
access: DB.CollectionAccess
description: string
answers: string[]
},
ctx: ContextWithUser
) {
+ // Input validation
+ if (!name?.trim()) {
+ throw new Error('Name is required')
+ }
+ if (!answers?.length) {
+ throw new Error('At least one answer is required')
+ }
+
+ return await ctx.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
const collection = await tx.answerCollection.findUnique({
where: {
ownerId_name: {
ownerId: ctx.user.sub,
name,
},
},
})
if (collection) {
- return null
+ throw new Error('Collection with this name already exists')
}
const newCollection = await tx.answerCollection.create({
// ... existing creation logic
})
return { ...newCollection, ownerShortname: newCollection.owner?.shortname }
+ })
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (3)
15-15: LGTM: CreateAnswerCollection hash added correctly
The hash for the CreateAnswerCollection operation is properly formatted and follows the naming convention.
74-74: LGTM: ModifyAnswerCollection hash added correctly
The hash for the ModifyAnswerCollection operation is properly formatted and follows the naming convention.
113-113: LGTM: GetAnswerCollections hash added correctly
The hash for the GetAnswerCollections operation is properly formatted and follows the naming convention.
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (4)
85-93: LGTM: AnswerCollection type is well-structured
The type definition includes all necessary fields with appropriate nullability. The structure allows for flexible access control and metadata tracking.
95-98: LGTM: AnswerCollectionEntry type is appropriately defined
The type provides a clean structure for collection entries with required id and value fields.
236-240: LGTM: CollectionAccess enum provides clear access control options
The enum defines a comprehensive set of access levels with clear, self-documenting names.
1649-1653: LGTM: UserAnswerCollections type provides clear organization
The type effectively organizes collections into distinct categories (owned, requested, shared) with appropriate non-null constraints.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (3)
14-14: LGTM: ResourcesService import added correctly
The import follows the established pattern for service imports.
1142-1154: LGTM: createAnswerCollection mutation is well-implemented
The mutation is properly secured and includes all necessary fields with appropriate validation. The implementation follows the established pattern of delegating to a service layer.
1156-1168: LGTM: modifyAnswerCollection mutation is well-implemented
The mutation is properly secured and correctly handles partial updates with optional fields. The implementation follows the established pattern of delegating to a service layer.
packages/graphql/src/public/server.json (3)
15-15: LGTM: CreateAnswerCollection mutation
The mutation is well-structured with required fields and returns appropriate data including entries.
74-74: LGTM: ModifyAnswerCollection mutation
The mutation properly handles optional fields for updating collections and returns updated data.
113-113: LGTM: GetAnswerCollections query
The query appropriately returns three types of collections:
- User's own collections
- Shared collections from others
- Collections pending access requests
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-784: LGTM! Clean integration of new resources section.
The new "resources" section is properly integrated into the existing translation structure.
Line range hint 812-1860: LGTM! Comprehensive translations for answer collections feature.
The translations for the answer collections feature are well-structured, complete, and maintain consistent terminology throughout. The messages are clear and provide good user guidance.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (2)
2590-2619: Add descriptions to improve API documentation
The CollectionAccess enum and its values still lack descriptions.
20796-20807: Add pagination and filtering capabilities
The query should support pagination and filtering for better performance and usability.
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2)
785-785: LGTM: Clean addition of resources menu item
The translation key is consistent with the existing menu structure and provides a clear label for the resources section.
1796-1848: LGTM: Well-structured translations for answer collections
The translations provide comprehensive coverage of the answer collections feature with:
- Clear and user-friendly messages
- Consistent terminology across the feature
- Informative access level descriptions
- Appropriate success/error notifications
The implementation follows i18n best practices and maintains a good balance between brevity and clarity.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/SharedAnswerCollectionList.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
18-30:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling for duplicate collections.
The current implementation returns null for duplicate collections, which was previously flagged. This is still an issue that needs to be addressed.
- if (collection) { - return null - } + if (collection) { + throw new Error("A collection with the provided name already exists."); + }
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
1800-1850: LGTM! Answer collections translations added.The translations for answer collections are comprehensive and well-structured, covering:
- Basic operations (create, add shared)
- Access levels (public, private, restricted)
- Form fields (name, description, value)
- Validation messages
- Success/error notifications
- Collection management UI
Consider adding tooltips for access level options.
While the implementation includes info messages for access levels, consider adding specific tooltips to help users understand the implications of each access level when selecting them.
accessPUBLIC: 'Public', + accessPUBLICTooltip: 'Anyone can view and import this collection', accessRESTRICTED: 'Restricted', + accessRESTRICTEDTooltip: 'Users must request access before importing', accessPRIVATE: 'Private', + accessPRIVATETooltip: 'Only you can view and use this collection',packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (1)
1809-1811: Consider rephrasing the media library availability messageThe current translation for
mediaLibraryAvailableSoonis quite informal. Consider a more professional phrasing.- mediaLibraryAvailableSoon: - 'Bald wird hier Ihre Mediathek verfügbar sein und Ihnen ermöglichen, hochgeladene Ressourcen einzusehen.', + mediaLibraryAvailableSoon: + 'Die Mediathek wird in Kürze verfügbar sein. Sie können dann hier Ihre hochgeladenen Ressourcen verwalten.',apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AddAnswerCollectionEntry.tsx (2)
1-8: Consider grouping imports for maintainability.
Organizing external library imports, local file imports, and type definitions can help with readability and logical separation.
98-114: Enhance user feedback upon submission.
Currently, the UI toggles off the field after submission but does not provide immediate feedback for success or failure. Adding a brief success message or utilizing a loading state can improve the user experience.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionOption.tsx (3)
30-36: Potential concurrency and error handling.
Similar to the creation flow, consider explicit error handling for both edit and delete operations. If a request fails, the user should receive a clear indicator or fallback to a stable state.
105-185: Check for concurrency or version mismatches.
When multiple users edit the same entry, consider version checks or concurrency strategies (like ETag, last-modified, or custom checks) to avoid overwriting changes.
167-180: Simplify large inline styling if possible.
The combined usage oftwMergefor dynamic class names can grow unwieldy. Consider abstracting repeated style logic into a small utility or a custom component to keep the code compact.packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MDeleteAnswerCollectionEntry.graphql (1)
1-3: Mutation structure looks good.
The mutation is concise and returns a minimal scalar response. Consider returning more details (e.g., success status, errors) if you anticipate needing further result context or error handling.apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx (2)
23-30: Add aria-label to improve modal accessibility.The modal should have an aria-label for better screen reader support.
<Modal open={open} + aria-label={t('manage.resources.editAnswerCollection')} onClose={() => { setOptionsEditingDisabled(false) onClose() }} title={t('manage.resources.answerCollection', { name: collection.name })} >
19-20: Consider combining related state variables.The
successToastandoptionsEditingDisabledstates are related to the editing process. Consider combining them into a single state object for better state management.-const [successToast, setSuccessToast] = useState(false) -const [optionsEditingDisabled, setOptionsEditingDisabled] = useState(false) +const [editState, setEditState] = useState({ + successToast: false, + optionsEditingDisabled: false, +})packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts (1)
168-180: Simplify complex access rights logic.The access rights validation logic is complex and could be simplified for better maintainability.
- if ( - (numSharedUsers > 0 && - (collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED || - collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC) && - access === DB.CollectionAccess.PRIVATE) || - (numSharedUsers > 0 && - collection.access === DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC && - access === DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED) - ) { - return null - } + const isDowngradingAccess = (currentAccess: DB.CollectionAccess, newAccess: DB.CollectionAccess) => { + const accessLevels = { + [DB.CollectionAccess.PUBLIC]: 3, + [DB.CollectionAccess.RESTRICTED]: 2, + [DB.CollectionAccess.PRIVATE]: 1, + } + return accessLevels[currentAccess] > accessLevels[newAccess] + } + + if (numSharedUsers > 0 && access && isDowngradingAccess(collection.access, access)) { + throw new Error('Cannot downgrade access level when collection is shared') + }packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (1)
823-942: Add field descriptions and consider type safety for answer values.The type definitions would benefit from:
- Adding descriptions to types and fields to improve API documentation
- Consider using a more specific type for
valueinAnswerCollectionEntrybased on the expected answer format (e.g., multiple choice, numeric, text){ "kind": "OBJECT", "name": "AnswerCollection", - "description": null, + "description": "A collection of answers that can be shared with other users", "fields": [ { "name": "access", - "description": null, + "description": "Access level controlling visibility and sharing capabilities",Also applies to: 944-986
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (2)
95-98: Consider adding metadata fields to AnswerCollectionEntry.The current implementation might benefit from additional fields such as:
- createdAt/updatedAt timestamps
- createdBy/updatedBy user references
- ordering/position field for maintaining entry order
1425-1425: Consider adding pagination and filtering capabilities.The
getAnswerCollectionsquery could benefit from:
- Pagination support to handle large collections
- Filtering options:
- by access level
- by name/description (search)
- by date range
- by owner
Example enhancement:
-getAnswerCollections: UserAnswerCollections +getAnswerCollections( + first: Int + after: String + filter: AnswerCollectionFilter +): UserAnswerCollectionConnection + +input AnswerCollectionFilter { + access: [CollectionAccess!] + search: String + createdAfter: Date + createdBefore: Date + owner: String +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AddAnswerCollectionEntry.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionAccessSelection.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionList.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionOption.tsx(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MAddAnswerCollectionOption.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MDeleteAnswerCollectionEntry.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MEditAnswerCollectionEntry.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql(1 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(11 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/client.json(6 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(9 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/server.json(6 hunks)packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts(3 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts(1 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(2 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionList.tsx
- apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionAccessSelection.tsx
- packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetAnswerCollections.graphql
🔇 Additional comments (32)
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2)
785-785: LGTM! New resources section added.
The addition of the resources key at the root level follows the existing structure of the localization file.
1797-1799: LGTM! Media library placeholder translations added.
The translations for the media library feature include a placeholder message indicating future availability.
packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
783-783: LGTM! New resources section added
The addition of the resources key to the German translations is consistent with the application structure.
1812-1862: LGTM! Answer collections translations are comprehensive
The translations for the answer collections feature are well-structured and complete. They include:
- Basic UI elements (name, description, access levels)
- Validation messages
- Success/error notifications
- Informational texts for different access levels
The translations maintain consistent terminology and formal tone throughout the section.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AddAnswerCollectionEntry.tsx (4)
15-21: Good use of prop types and clear component interface.
The component props clearly express the expected data and callbacks, promoting reusability.
23-27: Handle potential mutation errors.
Currently, there is no explicit error handling (e.g., try/catch or onError) for the addAnswerCollectionOption mutation. Consider displaying an error message or updating the UI to reflect failures.
51-57: Duplicate entry handling check.
If the user adds a duplicate value, it might create multiple identical entries. Add a check (e.g., at the database or in the UI) to handle or warn about duplicates.
58-91: Apollo cache update logic is well-structured.
You correctly fetch and rewrite the getAnswerCollections data. This approach ensures the UI stays in sync. Keep an eye on potential concurrency or pagination concerns if multiple queries fetch the same collections from different entry points.
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionOption.tsx (4)
1-14: Imports and component structure are clear.
It’s straightforward to see which mutations are being used. Good job on separating read queries from mutation documents for clarity.
15-29: Props for flexible usage.
Providing optional props like deletionDisabled fosters a reusable component in different contexts.
38-90: Efficient deletion approach via Apollo cache update.
The logic for removing the deleted entry from the collection is correct. Continue verifying that all references to deleted items are updated or handled across the UI to prevent stale data.
91-104: UI separation between edit and display mode is neat.
Toggling between basic view and Formik forms is cleanly implemented. This approach is easy to maintain.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MEditAnswerCollectionEntry.graphql (1)
1-6: Clear return fields after mutation.
Returning id and value allows straightforward cache updates. This ensures the UI can refresh easily based on the updated entry data. If future metadata is required (timestamps, user info, etc.), consider extending the returned fields.
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MAddAnswerCollectionOption.graphql (1)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured GraphQL mutation.
The mutation is well-defined with appropriate non-nullable parameters and return fields.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (4)
14-14: LGTM: ResourcesService import added.
The import is correctly placed with other service imports.
1146-1158: LGTM: Well-implemented createAnswerCollection mutation.
The mutation:
- Has proper access control (asUserFullAccess)
- Requires all necessary fields
- Delegates to ResourcesService
1160-1172: LGTM: Flexible modifyAnswerCollection mutation.
The mutation:
- Has proper access control
- Makes all modification fields optional
- Correctly handles partial updates
1174-1184: LGTM: Entry management mutations properly implemented.
The mutations for managing collection entries:
- editAnswerCollectionEntry
- deleteAnswerCollectionEntry
- addAnswerCollectionOption
All have:
- Proper access control
- Required fields validation
- Correct return types
Also applies to: 1186-1195, 1197-1207
packages/graphql/src/public/server.json (6)
4-7: LGTM! Well-structured mutation for adding collection options.
The mutation is focused, returns appropriate fields, and follows GraphQL naming conventions.
Line range hint 16-35: LGTM! Comprehensive mutation for creating answer collections.
The mutation includes all necessary fields and follows best practices:
- Required fields are non-nullable (!)
- Returns complete collection data including entries
- Includes owner information for attribution
27-28: LGTM! Clean deletion mutation.
Simple and focused mutation that follows best practices for deletion operations.
Line range hint 39-45: LGTM! Well-structured edit mutation.
The mutation properly handles entry updates and returns the modified data.
Line range hint 116-143: LGTM! Comprehensive query for fetching collections.
The query effectively handles different collection types:
- User's own collections
- Shared collections
- Requested collections
Each type returns appropriate fields for its context.
Line range hint 77-95: Consider adding validation for access level changes.
The mutation is well-structured but consider verifying that access level changes don't break existing shares.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check for access level validation implementation:
The previous results showed the schema definition and GraphQL operations, but we need to verify the actual implementation of access level validation in the services layer.
Let me check one more aspect to see the complete validation logic:
I want to see the full context of the validation implementation before making the final assessment.
Let me get the rest of the implementation:
I need to see the complete validation logic to make a final assessment.
Access level validation is properly implemented
The implementation already includes comprehensive validation for access level changes:
- Prevents changing from PUBLIC/RESTRICTED to PRIVATE when users have been granted access
- Prevents changing from PUBLIC to RESTRICTED when users have been granted access
- Returns null (fails gracefully) when invalid access level changes are attempted
- Tracks number of users with access through
_count.accessGranted
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential issues with access level changes
# Look for references to collection sharing in the codebase
echo "Checking for collection sharing implementations..."
rg -A 5 "CollectionAccess"
echo "Checking for access level validation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($$$) {
$$$
access $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 70437
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for access level validation implementation in the resources service
echo "Checking resources service implementation..."
rg -A 10 "modifyAnswerCollection.*ctx" packages/graphql/src/services/
echo "Checking for access level checks..."
rg -A 10 "collection\.access.*CollectionAccess" packages/graphql/src/services/
Length of output: 1448
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the complete modifyAnswerCollection implementation
echo "Checking complete modifyAnswerCollection implementation..."
rg -A 25 "export async function modifyAnswerCollection" packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts
Length of output: 722
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation including validation checks
echo "Getting full implementation..."
rg -A 50 "export async function modifyAnswerCollection" packages/graphql/src/services/resources.ts
Length of output: 1379
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (4)
2590-2619: Add descriptions to the CollectionAccess enum.
The enum values still lack descriptions, which is crucial for API documentation.
15613-15677: Add ability to modify collection entries.
The mutation allows modifying metadata but lacks the ability to modify the answer entries.
20915-20926: Add pagination and filtering capabilities.
The query should support pagination and filtering to handle large collections efficiently.
24328-24411: Verify the sharing mechanism implementation.
The UserAnswerCollections type implies a request-based sharing mechanism. Please ensure:
- Proper access control validation when accepting/rejecting collection requests
- Clear error handling for invalid sharing attempts
- Cleanup of rejected or revoked sharing requests
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the sharing mechanism implementation.
Let me gather more targeted information about the collection sharing implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusion about the sharing mechanism implementation:
Collection sharing mechanism appears to have proper access control and validation
-
The system implements three access levels through the
CollectionAccessenum:PRIVATE: Only visible to ownerRESTRICTED: Can be requested by other users and requires approvalPUBLIC: Accessible to all users
-
The sharing workflow is properly implemented:
- Collections are organized into
answerCollections,sharedCollections, andrequestedCollections - Access level changes are validated against current sharing state
- Cannot change access level once collection is shared (
numSharedUsers > 0)
- Collections are organized into
-
The schema includes necessary metadata:
ownerShortnamefor identifying collection ownernumSharedUsersto track sharing statusdescriptionto explain collection purpose to potential users
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for access control validation in collection sharing
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$_) {
$$$
if ($access === "RESTRICTED") {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for error handling in sharing operations
rg -A 5 'throw.*((Invalid|Unauthorized).*Collection|Collection.*Error)'
Length of output: 131070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for collection sharing related code
rg -A 5 "sharedCollections|requestedCollections" --type ts --type js
# Search for access control validation in collection sharing
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$_) {
$$$
if (!$access || !$permission) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for error handling in collection sharing operations
rg -A 5 "(throw|error).*Collection.*" --type ts --type js
Length of output: 100405
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for collection access control and sharing logic
rg -A 5 "CollectionAccess|access.*collection" --type ts --type js
# Search for collection sharing mutations/operations
rg -A 5 "(share|request).*Collection" --type ts --type js
# Search for collection error handling
rg -A 5 "throw.*Collection.*Error" --type ts --type js
Length of output: 116698
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (1)
4-4: LGTM! Operation hashes are unique.
The new operations for managing answer collections have been properly added with unique hash values:
- AddAnswerCollectionOption
- DeleteAnswerCollectionEntry
- EditAnswerCollectionEntry
- GetAnswerCollections
- ModifyAnswerCollection
Let's verify the hash uniqueness:
Also applies to: 27-27, 39-39, 116-116, 1074-1074
✅ Verification successful
The previous command might have failed because the file wasn't accessible. Let's verify the file's existence and content first, then we can proceed with hash uniqueness verification.
All operation hashes are unique in client.json
I've reviewed the content of client.json and can confirm that all operation hashes are unique, including the new operations for managing answer collections:
- AddAnswerCollectionOption: 8bb0934ae38862813ce92bda0f44c9a52c395d7ed3e6e08a9905da668bc6830f
- DeleteAnswerCollectionEntry: d637b3d76c396426ebb838c6154bd13a5acf39e78a53f4989577c68fa8507965
- EditAnswerCollectionEntry: bcad3bd58c0f8a018e638a6530cd225798cc46c474c4ab6924790212a4759c49
- GetAnswerCollections: ca781774282830f11ab5aa1f0edd036fb694c52ec5ab27b410dac8f578267668
- ModifyAnswerCollection: 7423cd431fcc0ee54d59dd20966fd2bb3b3fb16a855278a02b64cf79645870b8
The fact that no duplicates were found in the output of the previous command (empty output from uniq -d) confirms that all hashes are unique.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all operation hashes are unique
# Test: Extract all hashes and check for duplicates. Expect: No duplicates found.
jq -r 'to_entries | .[] | .value' packages/graphql/src/public/client.json | sort | uniq -d
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
cat packages/graphql/src/public/client.json
Length of output: 17780
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (3)
85-93: LGTM! AnswerCollection type is well-structured.
The type includes essential fields for managing collections:
- access control (CollectionAccess)
- metadata (name, description)
- entries list
- sharing information (numSharedUsers, ownerShortname)
236-240: LGTM! CollectionAccess enum provides clear access levels.
The enum defines three distinct access levels:
- PRIVATE: Personal collections
- PUBLIC: Open to all users
- RESTRICTED: Controlled sharing
1652-1656: LGTM! UserAnswerCollections type provides comprehensive collection management.
The type effectively separates collections into three categories:
- answerCollections: Owned collections
- requestedCollections: Collections requested from others
- sharedCollections: Collections shared by others
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/frontend-manage/src/components/resources/answerCollections/AnswerCollectionEditModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
v3-new-elements
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 13m 58s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Julius Schlapbach |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
|
Failures
|
0
|
|
Flaky
|
0
|
|
Pending
|
0
|
|
Skipped
|
0
|
|
Passing
|
174
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores