Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: unify and simplify types structure for element options #4475

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

sjschlapbach
Copy link
Member

@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach commented Jan 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated type definitions across multiple packages to improve type safety and clarity.
    • Introduced new type aliases and interfaces with enhanced null value support.
    • Modernized type structures for numerical, free text, and selection element options.
    • Renamed "question options" to "element options" in relevant components and functions.

Copy link

aviator-app bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This PR was merged manually (without Aviator). Merging manually can negatively impact the performance of the queue. Consider using Aviator next time.


See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces comprehensive type modifications across multiple packages, focusing on enhancing type definitions for question elements in the GraphQL schema. The changes primarily involve updating type imports from @klicker-uzh/types, replacing existing interfaces with new type aliases, and introducing more flexible type definitions that allow for null values. The modifications span packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts, packages/graphql/src/schema/question.ts, and packages/types/src/index.ts, aiming to improve type clarity and maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/types/src/index.ts - Added new types: NumericalRestrictions, FreeTextRestrictions, SelectionAnswerCollectionEntry
- Updated interfaces to allow null values and use new type definitions
packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts - Replaced old interfaces with new type imports
- Updated element data interfaces to use new types
packages/graphql/src/schema/question.ts - Added new type aliases for element options
- Updated interface signatures to use new type definitions
apps/func-response-processor/src/index.ts - Updated comment to reflect terminology change from "question options" to "element options"
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateAndProcessElementOptions.ts - Renamed QuestionOptionsArgs to ElementOptionsArgs in interface and function signature
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateElementInputs.ts - Updated import and interface property to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateFreeTextOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateMCOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateNumericalOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSCOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSelectionOptions.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSharedChoicesFields.ts - Updated function signature to use ElementOptionsArgs instead of QuestionOptionsArgs
packages/shared-components/src/ChoicesQuestion.tsx - Updated ChoicesQuestionProps to use ChoiceElementOptions instead of ChoiceQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/FreeTextQuestion.tsx - Updated FreeTextQuestionProps to use FreeTextElementOptions instead of FreeTextQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/NumericalQuestion.tsx - Updated NumericalQuestionProps to use NumericalElementOptions instead of NumericalQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx - Updated SelectionQuestionProps to use SelectionElementOptions instead of SelectionQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/FTEvaluation.tsx - Updated FTEvaluationProps to use FreeTextElementOptions instead of FreeTextQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/NREvaluation.tsx - Updated NREvaluationProps to use NumericalElementOptions instead of NumericalQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/SEEvaluation.tsx - Updated SEEValuation function to use SelectionElementOptions instead of SelectionQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx - Updated SELECTIONAnswerOptionsProps to use SelectionElementOptions instead of SelectionQuestionOptions
packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts - Updated validation functions to use FreeTextElementOptions and NumericalElementOptions instead of FreeTextQuestionOptions and NumericalQuestionOptions

Possibly related PRs

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XXL This PR changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 24, 2025
@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach changed the base branch from v3 to v3-case-study January 24, 2025 09:21
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateNumericalOptions.ts (1)

Line range hint 3-31: Validate all solution ranges or exact solutions instead of just the first.
You currently check only the first item in the lists. If multiple solution ranges or exact solutions can exist, users might provide partially valid data. Consider iterating through all elements to ensure full validation.

- const invalidSolutionRange =
-   options.solutionRanges &&
-   (options.solutionRanges.length === 0 ||
-     ((options.solutionRanges[0]?.min === null ||
-       typeof options.solutionRanges[0]?.min === 'undefined') &&
-       (options.solutionRanges[0]?.max === null ||
-         typeof options.solutionRanges[0]?.max === 'undefined')))
+ const hasInvalidSolutionRange =
+   options.solutionRanges?.some(
+     (range) =>
+       (range.min === null || typeof range.min === 'undefined') &&
+       (range.max === null || typeof range.max === 'undefined')
+   )
+ const invalidSolutionRange =
+   !options.solutionRanges || options.solutionRanges.length === 0 || hasInvalidSolutionRange
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts (1)

1-1: Consider using a more descriptive error handling strategy instead of console.error.
Currently, this function returns a boolean and logs a string to console.error. For better maintainability (e.g., i18n, structured logs, consistency across your application), consider throwing a well-typed error or returning an object containing an error message.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSCOptions.ts (1)

1-1: Use consistent error reporting.
At the moment, you're using console.error for reporting validation failures, just like in other validation functions. If your codebase adopts a consistent error-handling or logging pattern, consider abstracting error logging, or switching to exceptions for uniformity.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateMCOptions.ts (1)

1-1: Maintain a uniform logging or error strategy across validation functions.
Similar to validateSCOptions and validateKPRIMOptions, you log errors with console.error. To maintain consistency and possibly integrate advanced logging in the future, structure your errors in a common format.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateNumericalOptions.ts (1)

1-1: Consider aligning with the shared-choices approach if feasible.
For code consistency, you might unify all validation flows (including numerical) under a shared abstraction. Even though numerical questions differ from choice-based questions, a shared approach or partial code reuse can reduce duplication.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSharedChoicesFields.ts (1)

4-4: Confirm no redundant validations.
The retrieved learnings mention that validateSharedChoicesFields is comprehensive for SC, MC, and KPRIM question types. Ensure other specialized validation functions (validateSCOptions, validateMCOptions, etc.) do not replicate these checks unnecessarily.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateAndProcessElementOptions.ts (1)

10-10: Consider removing or repurposing the feedback field.
It's marked as // unused. If it truly has no purpose, removing it helps keep the interface minimal and easier to maintain.

 export interface ElementOptionsArgs {
   ...
-  feedback?: string | null // unused
   ...
 }
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSelectionOptions.ts (1)

Line range hint 3-31: Enhance error handling by throwing errors instead of logging.

Right now, this validation function logs errors using console.error and returns a boolean. While this is functional, throwing typed errors or returning structured responses can make error handling more robust and traceable across the system. Consider refactoring to use thrown errors or a standardized error format to improve testability and clarity.

Here’s an example snippet:

-function validateSelectionOptions(options?: ElementOptionsArgs | null) {
+function validateSelectionOptions(options?: ElementOptionsArgs | null): true {
   // ...
   if (!options || typeof options.hasSampleSolution !== 'boolean' || options.hasSampleSolution === null) {
-    console.error('Options and sample solution flag are required for selection questions')
-    return false
+    throw new Error('Options and sample solution flag are required for selection questions')
   }
   // ...
   return true
 }
packages/types/src/index.ts (1)

199-244: Excellent architectural improvements to the type system.

The changes demonstrate a systematic approach to type definition with several key improvements:

  1. Consistent separation of restrictions into dedicated types
  2. Unified nullability handling across all options
  3. Clear inheritance hierarchy with BaseElementOptions
  4. Standardized naming convention using 'Element' instead of 'Question'

These changes will improve maintainability and type safety across the codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f06bd55 and 1cf5999.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json is excluded by !**/**/ops.schema.json
  • packages/graphql/src/ops.ts is excluded by !**/**/ops.ts
  • packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql is excluded by !**/**/public/**
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
  • apps/func-response-processor/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateAndProcessElementOptions.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateElementInputs.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateFreeTextOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateMCOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateNumericalOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSCOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSelectionOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSharedChoicesFields.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts (10 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/src/schema/question.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/ChoicesQuestion.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/FreeTextQuestion.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/NumericalQuestion.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/FTEvaluation.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/NREvaluation.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/SEEvaluation.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/types/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/func-response-processor/src/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/graphql/src/schema/question.ts
  • packages/graphql/src/schema/elementData.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts (2)
Learnt from: sjschlapbach
PR: uzh-bf/klicker-uzh#4468
File: packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts:4-15
Timestamp: 2025-01-17T17:24:24.190Z
Learning: The validateSharedChoicesFields function performs comprehensive validation for choice-based questions (SC, MC, KPRIM), including:
1. Checking if options and options.choices are defined
2. Ensuring at least one choice exists
3. Validating each choice has valid ix and value
4. Validating displayMode
5. Validating sample solution and feedback flags
6. Validating correct flags when sample solution is enabled
7. Validating feedback when both flags are enabled
Therefore, additional null/undefined checks in the specific validation functions (validateSCOptions, validateMCOptions, validateKPRIMOptions) are redundant.
Learnt from: sjschlapbach
PR: uzh-bf/klicker-uzh#4468
File: packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts:4-15
Timestamp: 2025-01-17T17:24:24.190Z
Learning: In validateKPRIMOptions and other choice-based validation functions (SC, MC), there's no need to check for null/undefined options and choices as these are already validated by validateSharedChoicesFields which is called at the beginning of these functions.
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSCOptions.ts (1)
Learnt from: sjschlapbach
PR: uzh-bf/klicker-uzh#4468
File: packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts:4-15
Timestamp: 2025-01-17T17:24:24.190Z
Learning: The validateSharedChoicesFields function performs comprehensive validation for choice-based questions (SC, MC, KPRIM), including:
1. Checking if options and options.choices are defined
2. Ensuring at least one choice exists
3. Validating each choice has valid ix and value
4. Validating displayMode
5. Validating sample solution and feedback flags
6. Validating correct flags when sample solution is enabled
7. Validating feedback when both flags are enabled
Therefore, additional null/undefined checks in the specific validation functions (validateSCOptions, validateMCOptions, validateKPRIMOptions) are redundant.
packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSharedChoicesFields.ts (1)
Learnt from: sjschlapbach
PR: uzh-bf/klicker-uzh#4468
File: packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts:4-15
Timestamp: 2025-01-17T17:24:24.190Z
Learning: The validateSharedChoicesFields function performs comprehensive validation for choice-based questions (SC, MC, KPRIM), including:
1. Checking if options and options.choices are defined
2. Ensuring at least one choice exists
3. Validating each choice has valid ix and value
4. Validating displayMode
5. Validating sample solution and feedback flags
6. Validating correct flags when sample solution is enabled
7. Validating feedback when both flags are enabled
Therefore, additional null/undefined checks in the specific validation functions (validateSCOptions, validateMCOptions, validateKPRIMOptions) are redundant.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: SonarCloud
  • GitHub Check: check
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (33)
packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/NREvaluation.tsx (2)

3-3: Confirmed alignment with the new type import.
It's good to see the import of NumericalElementOptions and NumericalInstanceEvaluation here, aligning this component with the broader type refactor. No issues found with the import statement.


11-11: Confirm consistency with existing references.
Changing options to NumericalElementOptions is consistent with the PR objectives. However, ensure that any external references or consuming components expecting NumericalQuestionOptions are updated accordingly.

packages/shared-components/src/NumericalQuestion.tsx (2)

2-2: Validate import usage across all referencing components.
Importing NumericalElementOptions and NumericalInstanceEvaluation aligns with the updated structure. Confirm all references to these types in the codebase are synchronized to avoid mismatches.


16-16: Ensure typed properties match user input validations.
Switching from NumericalQuestionOptions to NumericalElementOptions is aligned with the new design. Double-check that all property references (e.g., restrictions, accuracy) are valid and that related validation logic (like validateNumericalResponse) still behaves correctly with the new type.

packages/shared-components/src/utils/validateResponse.ts (2)

2-3: Imports match the new element option types. Good job!
These updated import statements correctly align with the unified element options structure.


70-70: Ensure consistent usage of new FreeTextElementOptions throughout the codebase.
The type update for options looks correct here. Verify that any functions or components referencing FreeTextQuestionOptions have also been updated to avoid type mismatches.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateKPRIMOptions.ts (1)

Line range hint 4-10: Validate the non-null assertions.
Because validateSharedChoicesFields(options) ensures options and options.choices are valid before returning true, your use of options!.choices! is logically sound. However, if you anticipate future changes to validateSharedChoicesFields, consider explicitly handling null or undefined in a single line with a check or a type guard, maintaining clarity over the entire codebase.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSCOptions.ts (1)

Line range hint 4-16: Ensure test coverage for sample solution logic.
This function checks for a single correct answer when sample solution is enabled. Ensure that your tests cover boundary cases (e.g., no choices marked correct, multiple choices marked correct, etc.).

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateMCOptions.ts (1)

Line range hint 4-16: Add tests for edge cases.
For MC questions with sample solutions, test scenarios with zero correct answers, exactly one correct answer, and multiple correct answers to ensure the validation logic works comprehensively.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSharedChoicesFields.ts (1)

2-2: Renamed import to reflect the new element-centric approach.
Great that you're transitioning from QuestionOptionsArgs to ElementOptionsArgs. Be sure to check the rest of the codebase so that any references to the old import name remain consistent and error-free.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateElementInputs.ts (2)

2-2: Maintain consistency with the new type.
You've replaced QuestionOptionsArgs with ElementOptionsArgs in the import. Confirm that all references within and beyond this file have been updated and are in sync with the new type definition.


11-11: Interface property update is aligned with the new element-based structure.
This is a purposeful rename from QuestionOptionsArgs to ElementOptionsArgs. Good job on updating the interface property as well. No issues detected with this line.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateAndProcessElementOptions.ts (1)

43-43: Good alignment of the function parameter with the new interface.
Switching options to ElementOptionsArgs maintains consistency across all element types. Verify that any downstream usage expects the updated structure.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateFreeTextOptions.ts (2)

1-1: Import new unified type.
This import aligns with the new approach to unify element option types across the codebase.


3-3: Ensure consistent usage and validation coverage.
Converting the function argument from QuestionOptionsArgs to ElementOptionsArgs is consistent with the broader refactor. Double-check that all calls and unit tests use ElementOptionsArgs correctly to avoid any potential type mismatch.

packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/FTEvaluation.tsx (2)

2-2: Refined import statement.
Replacing FreeTextQuestionOptions with FreeTextElementOptions import ensures consistency with the updated type structure.


9-9: Interface property type updated.
Switching options to FreeTextElementOptions matches the newly unified type definitions. Confirm downstream consumers also use the updated type without conflicts.

packages/shared-components/src/FreeTextQuestion.tsx (2)

2-2: Imports aligned with new definitions.
Good job favoring FreeTextElementOptions to keep the codebase consistent with the new naming convention.


16-16: Updated property signature.
Switching options from FreeTextQuestionOptions to FreeTextElementOptions properly reflects the refactor. Ensure that tests or any related QA steps validate this new shape thoroughly.

packages/shared-components/src/SelectionQuestion.tsx (2)

2-2: New import for selection element.
The import of SelectionElementOptions aligns with the broader replacement of older selection types, improving maintainability.


18-18: Revised props to match unified selection options.
Changing options to SelectionElementOptions is consistent with the updated structure. Verify that logic tied to the old type, such as defaults or validations, behaves correctly.

packages/shared-components/src/questions/SELECTIONAnswerOptions.tsx (2)

11-11: Ensured consistency in SELECTIONAnswerOptionsProps.

Switching from SelectionQuestionOptions to SelectionElementOptions maintains a clear naming convention and aligns with the broader refactor.


1-1: Confirmed import alignment with updated type naming.

Great job updating the import to SelectionElementOptions. Ensure all downstream dependencies also use the new type.

✅ Verification successful

Import alignment verified across all dependencies

The type SelectionElementOptions is consistently used and correctly imported from '@klicker-uzh/graphql/dist/ops' across all components and GraphQL operations in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify all references to SelectionElementOptions across the codebase
rg -A 3 "SelectionElementOptions"

Length of output: 68667

packages/shared-components/src/evaluation/SEEvaluation.tsx (2)

2-2: Import statement aligns with the refactored type.

Good consistency in updating the import to SelectionElementOptions.


17-17: Parameter signature correctly switched to SelectionElementOptions.

The updated parameter type reflects the new structure for selection-based questions. This appears correct and consistent with the rest of the code.

packages/shared-components/src/ChoicesQuestion.tsx (2)

2-2: Import updated to ChoiceElementOptions.

The import name now matches the unified element option types. Looks good.


25-25: Interface property updated to modern type definition.

Replacing ChoiceQuestionOptions with ChoiceElementOptions ensures consistency across choice-based elements.

packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSelectionOptions.ts (1)

1-1: Confirm consistency of the new ElementOptionsArgs import.

It's good to see that you're importing ElementOptionsArgs from the centralized location. Please confirm that the rest of the codebase no longer references the old QuestionOptionsArgs.

As a follow-up, run this script to locate any remaining references to QuestionOptionsArgs:

✅ Verification successful

Migration to ElementOptionsArgs is complete and consistent

The codebase shows no remaining references to QuestionOptionsArgs, and ElementOptionsArgs is consistently used across all validation files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
rg --fixed-strings "QuestionOptionsArgs" -A 5

Length of output: 45


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify file exists and repository is properly cloned
echo "=== Checking file existence ==="
ls packages/graphql/src/lib/validateSelectionOptions.ts

echo -e "\n=== Searching for both type names ==="
echo "ElementOptionsArgs references:"
rg "ElementOptionsArgs"
echo -e "\nQuestionOptionsArgs references:"
rg "QuestionOptionsArgs"

echo -e "\n=== Using ast-grep for type references ==="
echo "ElementOptionsArgs type references:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_: ElementOptionsArgs'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ extends ElementOptionsArgs'

Length of output: 2910

packages/types/src/index.ts (5)

199-202: Well-structured type definition for numerical restrictions!

The NumericalRestrictions type clearly defines optional validation ranges with explicit null handling.


209-216: Excellent use of inheritance pattern!

The BaseElementOptions interface effectively shares common properties across different element types, promoting code reuse and maintainability.


228-235: Consistent type structure for free text options!

The separation of FreeTextRestrictions and its integration into ElementOptionsFreeText follows a clean and consistent pattern.


237-244: Enhanced type safety with explicit entry type!

The introduction of SelectionAnswerCollectionEntry improves code clarity and maintainability by providing a reusable, well-defined structure for answer collection entries.


219-226: Verify the impact of nullable properties.

The interface now allows null values for multiple properties. While this provides more flexibility, it requires careful handling in the consuming code.

Let's check for potential null-safety issues:

✅ Verification successful

Nullable properties are safely handled throughout the codebase

The codebase consistently uses null coalescing (??) and optional chaining (?.) operators when accessing these properties. All consuming code properly handles the nullable values, with appropriate fallbacks to undefined where necessary.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct property access without null checks
rg -t typescript "options\.(accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)\." --glob '!packages/types/**'

# Search for potential type assertions or non-null assertions
rg -t typescript "options\.(accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)!" --glob '!packages/types/**'

Length of output: 320


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for property access patterns including destructuring
rg "\b(options\.(accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)|accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)\s*[:=]" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts --glob '!packages/types/**' -A 2

# Search for non-null assertions
rg "\b(options\.(accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)|accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions)!" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts --glob '!packages/types/**'

# Search for type guards or null checks
rg "\b(options\.(accuracy|placeholder|restrictions|solutionRanges|exactSolutions))(\s*\?\s*\.|&&|\|\||\?\.)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts --glob '!packages/types/**'

Length of output: 52816

@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach merged commit 7f474dd into v3-case-study Jan 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach deleted the unify-element-types branch January 24, 2025 09:28
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 24, 2025

klicker-uzh    Run #4155

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #4155  •  git commit c605819b9d ℹ️: Merge 1cf5999d59889aa923eb00c3158cda4f42e6537a into 136734307b521f4cf148fda49b8c...
Project klicker-uzh
Branch Review unify-element-types
Run status status check passed Passed #4155
Run duration 18m 41s
Commit git commit c605819b9d ℹ️: Merge 1cf5999d59889aa923eb00c3158cda4f42e6537a into 136734307b521f4cf148fda49b8c...
Committer Julius Schlapbach
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 311
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:XXL This PR changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant