-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add global variable example #51
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new source file Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/global_variable.c (1)
1-13
: Add documentation explaining the purpose of global variablesAdd comments explaining:
- Purpose of these global variables
- Expected access patterns
- Synchronization guarantees
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
build/global_variable.o
is excluded by!**/*.o
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CMakeLists.txt
(2 hunks)src/global_variable.c
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CMakeLists.txt (1)
28-28
: LGTM
Build configuration follows the established pattern and includes appropriate compilation flags.
Also applies to: 97-99
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/global_variable.c (1)
6-11
: Add example usage to the documentationThe comments explain the requirements well. Consider adding a brief example of how this module should be used by other BPF programs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
build/global_variable.o
is excluded by!**/*.o
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/global_variable.c
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/global_variable.c (2)
Learnt from: Alan-Jowett
PR: vbpf/ebpf-samples#51
File: src/global_variable.c:9-13
Timestamp: 2024-12-16T18:26:29.968Z
Learning: In the `src/global_variable.c` file of the `ebpf-samples` project, the functions `atomic_inc` and `atomic_add` are not defined or available.
Learnt from: Alan-Jowett
PR: vbpf/ebpf-samples#51
File: src/global_variable.c:6-7
Timestamp: 2024-12-16T18:26:11.366Z
Learning: In eBPF programs, the `atomic_t` type isn't valid; instead, use atomic built-in functions like `__sync_fetch_and_add` for atomic operations on global variables.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/global_variable.c (3)
1-4
: LGTM: License header is properly formatted
12-13
: LGTM: Global variables are properly declared
The volatile keyword and uint32_t type are appropriate for atomic operations.
15-19
: Mark unused parameter with attribute((unused))
The ctx parameter is required by the BPF program signature but not used in the function.
-int func(void* ctx) {
+int func(void* ctx __attribute__((unused))) {
__sync_fetch_and_add(&global_var, 1);
__sync_fetch_and_add(&global_var_2, 2);
return 0;
}
✅ Verification successful
Mark unused parameter with attribute((unused))
The suggestion is valid. The search results confirm that:
- The
void* ctx
parameter signature is consistently used across multiple BPF programs in the codebase - The parameter is often left unused, as seen in simple programs like
func0
,func1
in prog_array.c - When used, the parameter is accessed for BPF context operations
- Add
__attribute__((unused))
tosrc/global_variable.c:func()
to silence compiler warnings about the unused parameter while maintaining the required BPF program signature
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the function signature matches BPF program requirements
ast-grep --pattern 'int $func(void* $_) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BPF program signatures in C files
rg -t c "int.*\(void\*.*\)" -A 2
# Look for similar functions with unused attribute
rg -t c "__attribute__\(\(unused\)\)"
Length of output: 2655
This pull request includes updates to the build configuration and the addition of a new source file. The most important changes include adding a new object file to the build process and creating a new source file with its corresponding build command.
Build configuration updates:
CMakeLists.txt
: Addedglobal_variable.o
to the list of object files in theadd_custom_target(samples ALL
command.CMakeLists.txt
: Added a newadd_custom_command
for buildingglobal_variable.o
fromglobal_variable.c
.New source file:
src/global_variable.c
: Added a new source file defining two global variables and a function that modifies these variables.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes