Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix v8-cache asset handling #337

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2019
Merged

Fix v8-cache asset handling #337

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2019

Conversation

guybedford
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes #336.

There was a regression on the v8-cache when asset permissions handling was added. This should have been caught by the self-build, but the self-build was effectively working around the API difference.

Fixes the self-build too and includes and end-to-end test of the v8-cache.

@guybedford guybedford requested a review from styfle as a code owner April 1, 2019 14:17
@guybedford guybedford added the priority Important issue or pull request to fast-track label Apr 1, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #337 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 44.44%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #337   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.55%   69.55%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         381      381           
=======================================
  Hits          265      265           
  Misses        116      116
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 71.51% <44.44%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5974095...8199799. Read the comment docs.

@styfle styfle merged commit 44e0e4e into master Apr 1, 2019
@styfle styfle deleted the v8-cache-assets branch April 1, 2019 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority Important issue or pull request to fast-track
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TypeError: Cannot read property 'byteLength' of undefined
3 participants