Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmark for xlog. #2559

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

CPWstatic
Copy link
Contributor

@CPWstatic CPWstatic commented Aug 24, 2021

Close #2590

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 24, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@CPWstatic CPWstatic added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Aug 24, 2021
XLOG(INFO) << "Hello" \
<< " " \
<< "Wolrd" \
<< "123"; \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to test different length logs?

@CPWstatic CPWstatic merged commit 07b5470 into vesoft-inc:master Sep 18, 2021
@whitewum
Copy link
Contributor

doc required?

yixinglu pushed a commit to yixinglu/nebula that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
* refactor traverse output

* fix pruneproperties error & none_direct_dst

* fix test error

* fix shortest path

Co-authored-by: jimingquan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[QE]Xlog benchmark
6 participants