Suggested solution for supporting custom labels on file includes #71
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
awesome! |
victorjonsson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2014
Suggested solution for supporting custom labels on file includes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's an updated suggestion on how to support this:
aaslun@24ac91b
The custom label has to be assigned somehow when the file include is registered with Arlima, and in an attempt to avoid an implicit solution (using the arlima_file_args) I propose using array keys for the custom labels in the arlima_article_includes filter. Will it suffice?