Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: pull pr #7304 #108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

*: pull pr #7304 #108

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

GiedriusS
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull upstream thanos-io#7304 PR into our fork. It's a very hot path so CPU savings should be nice.

Remove a long-standing TODO item in the code - let's use the great loser
tree implementation by Bryan. It is faster than the heap because less
comparisons are needed. Should be a nice improvement given that the heap
is used in a lot of hot paths.

Since Prometheus also uses this library, it's tricky to import the "any"
version. I tried doing bboreham/go-loser#3 but
it's still impossible to do that. Let's just copy/paste the code, it's
not a lot.

Bench:

```
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/thanos-io/thanos/pkg/store
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10885H CPU @ 2.40GHz
             │   oldkway   │               newkway               │
             │   sec/op    │    sec/op     vs base               │
KWayMerge-16   2.292m ± 3%   2.075m ± 15%  -9.47% (p=0.023 n=10)

             │   oldkway    │               newkway               │
             │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base               │
KWayMerge-16   1.553Mi ± 0%   1.585Mi ± 0%  +2.04% (p=0.000 n=10)

             │   oldkway   │              newkway               │
             │  allocs/op  │  allocs/op   vs base               │
KWayMerge-16   27.26k ± 0%   26.27k ± 0%  -3.66% (p=0.000 n=10)
```

Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <[email protected]>
@GiedriusS GiedriusS merged commit 13610e4 into 0.34.0+vinted May 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@GiedriusS GiedriusS deleted the pull_pr_7304 branch May 31, 2024 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants