-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ssr): reusing imported imports #14456
Open
Dunqing
wants to merge
7
commits into
vitejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
Dunqing:feat/ssr/reusing
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
39fca82
feat(ssr): reusing imported imports
Dunqing e40f5cb
test: update case
Dunqing f596779
refactor: move logic to `defineImport`
Dunqing 3b3925e
refactor: rename to depToImportIdMap
Dunqing 0f66293
Merge branch 'main' into feat/ssr/reusing
Dunqing 0d4a037
Merge commit '4cedcdc99ca8ad38a67f46cf94dd3be65a567955' into feat/ssr…
Dunqing 9584bdd
test: update snap
Dunqing File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change was what I'm most concern of with my PR before. Besides
isExportAll
missing here (actually it seems like we don't need the property at all, I'll fix that), this PR would break something like:Where the
namedImportSpecifiers
won't be merged. Even if we solved this by merging implicitly, I'm still a bit concern if we have to add more metadata in the future, plus the execution order is already incorrect and fixing it might be harder after this PR 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, You have a point. This PR looks worthless currently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well it's great that we explore this though, so not worthless! But it might only be an optimization for a later time.