Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: update overlay style on mobile #15760

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

style: update overlay style on mobile #15760

Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a10d226
chore: overlay style opt
Jan 31, 2024
7abace7
chore: @media screen for style
Feb 1, 2024
760e872
fix: vh to vw
Feb 1, 2024
98d84d4
Merge branch 'vitejs:main' into main
PengBoUESTC Feb 18, 2024
9533827
chore: change window to border-box & remove media query
Feb 21, 2024
c438e3c
chore: stack wrap
Feb 25, 2024
1939055
chore: remove stack wrap
Mar 5, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions packages/vite/src/client/overlay.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,10 +44,11 @@ const template = /*html*/ `
.window {
font-family: var(--monospace);
line-height: 1.5;
width: 800px;
max-width: 80vw;
Copy link
Contributor

@chaejunlee chaejunlee Feb 29, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
max-width: 80vw;
width: 80vw;
max-width: 800px;

How about doing max-width: 800px; with width: 80vw;?
I believe that max-width should be a static value.
If we use max-width: 80vw;, it would expand infinitely and I believe it looks bad.

This applies to padding as well, however, I think we can use rem instead of px. What I found looked pretty good was padding: 1.5rem 2rem;

I am bringing up an extreme environment where screen width is 4000px wide, but I think you will get the point.

[visual viewport based]
Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 16 34 38

[max-width: 800px w/ rem padding]
Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 16 35 42

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that I see here, I think it would be better to have the block margin of .window to be dynamic to viewport height, i.e. margin: 10vh auto

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the problem is that, the overlay error info is not designed for Flexible screen, if U use big screen, the main problem maybe the font-size;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the problem is that, the overlay error info is not designed for Flexible screen, if U use big screen, the main problem maybe the font-size;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get what you mean, but as we are introducing this change to support mobile viewport, we should consider the wider viewport as well.

If you think my opinion is unrelated to your PR, I will open another PR after this one being merged and continue the discussion! 😊

color: var(--window-color);
box-sizing: border-box;
margin: 30px auto;
padding: 25px 40px;
padding: 2.5vh 4vw;
position: relative;
background: var(--window-background);
border-radius: 6px 6px 8px 8px;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -113,6 +114,8 @@ pre.frame {
.stack {
font-size: 13px;
color: var(--dim);
white-space: pre-wrap;
word-break: break-all;
bluwy marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
}

.tip {
Expand Down