-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Core] Priority-based scheduling in async engine #8850
Merged
youkaichao
merged 8 commits into
vllm-project:main
from
schoennenbeck:feature/priority-in-async-engine
Sep 27, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09712dc
Priority in async engine
schoennenbeck ed32cb9
Formatting
schoennenbeck 57c7b4e
More formatting
schoennenbeck feb30b9
Rollback of unnecessary formatting
schoennenbeck c9adc62
Add priority to generate and add_request
schoennenbeck 2b68c58
Fixed error handling
schoennenbeck ef536f6
Merge branch 'main' into feature/priority-in-async-engine
schoennenbeck 2e3e185
Fixed typo
schoennenbeck File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think we are passing
policy="priority"
anywhere, shall we add it to here so that user can actually leverage this. Otherwise, how are folks supposed to use this feature? @njhillThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think currently the only way of actually using the feature is to manually change the policy after creating the engine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, but shall we allow folks to specify through args? Like other param in the scheduler_config? I feel that's better for wider adoption for this feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I misread your comment. Yes I think this needs to go in the
EngineArgs
or some similar place. However, I think that should be a separate PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it's in SchedulerConfig but still needs to be wired in the EngineArgs to be able to enable it externally. Agree that could be done in a separate PR