-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
system libyaml #102
Comments
Why would such a behavior be desirable? Is this a way to get 1.2 support? |
As now 1.2 isn't ready in libyaml yaml/libyaml#20 You can get an idea of why bundling is bad here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries |
The current issue with this is that the current version of libyaml has a patch for indentation that doesn't not exist upstream. Indentation will break unless libyaml accepts that patch upstream if this is implemented. |
Have you proposed that patch upstream? |
I inherited this project. The patch was not proposed upstream. I'm doing diffs now to determine the scope of the patch. The secondary investigation is what compile flags exist and do for the libyaml library. |
I think this is difference.
|
I submitted the modifications as a pull request to the libyaml project. They had some outstanding tickets the pull request would solve. There's hope these two can be brought to the same version. |
One divergence in behavior between a system and the modified one in this package, now has a test case and an isolated patch with Issue #114 |
Pull requests were rejected. I cannot use the system library and get the expected behavior. I tried changed these things to the default of the library and the I started this project to change over to a yaml12 supported library: https://github.com/vubiostat/yaml12 I'll make it so it uses the system library. |
Can you provide a method to link to systemwide libyaml instead of the bundled one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: