Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring RecordDataFormatter spec provision #4195

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ThoWagen
Copy link
Contributor

@ThoWagen ThoWagen commented Jan 21, 2025

This PR moves the definition of RecordDataFormatter specifications from the factory to a new plugin manager. This has the advantage, that the RecordDataFormatter can be used for other RecordDrivers like EDS and that translations are available when defining the specs.

TODO

  • Update changelog when merging (changes to RecordDataFormatter constructor and types in method signatures; major changes to RecordDataFormatterFactory).
  • Update wiki documentation when merging
  • Update JIRA ticket for 12.0 deprecation removals

Copy link
Member

@demiankatz demiankatz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @ThoWagen -- this is a good idea; see below for a few minor suggestions!

Copy link
Member

@demiankatz demiankatz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @ThoWagen, I'm feeling very good about the direction this is taking. I've just left a couple of minor suggestions.

Once you've addressed those (and feel free to ignore any suggestions you don't like -- these ideas are purely optional), I think we should advertise this one on the pr-reviews channel on Slack to get a few more eyes on it, since it's a big and significant change.

@demiankatz demiankatz added this to the 11.0 milestone Jan 23, 2025
@demiankatz demiankatz added improvement architecture pull requests that involve significant refactoring / architectural changes labels Jan 23, 2025
Copy link
Member

@demiankatz demiankatz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me now! I've posted a note to the #pr-reviews channel in Slack, and will give some time to collect more feedback before formally approving and merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
architecture pull requests that involve significant refactoring / architectural changes improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants