Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(VDB-929) Use StorageKeyLookup in vDB #244

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 28, 2019

Conversation

rmulhol
Copy link
Contributor

@rmulhol rmulhol commented Oct 24, 2019

Companion PR to vulcanize/vulcanizedb#163

go.mod Outdated
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.0 // indirect
gopkg.in/natefinch/npipe.v2 v2.0.0-20160621034901-c1b8fa8bdcce // indirect
gopkg.in/urfave/cli.v1 v1.20.0 // indirect
gopkg.in/urfave/cli.v1 v1.22.1 // indirect
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick word on the deps here: these were added as a result of getting a specific branch of vDB. Happy to try and prune it down a bit but I'm also tempted to kick the can down the road to right before we cut a release (i.e. verifying dependencies match across repos when pre-building the plugin)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not 100% sure about updating that pesky urfave/cli to 1.22.1 - in vdb I think we still have it as 1.20.0. I was previously seeing issues when using a more recent version than this, but perhaps that's changed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough - will bump that back down

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interestingly, when I change the version, it just gets removed entirely from the go.mod file in the build 🤔

Going to push that up, but I think this could be an interesting scenario for our dep resolver at release time

@rmulhol rmulhol force-pushed the vdb-929-move-shared-files-to-vdb branch from bf131d9 to 6ba26ec Compare October 28, 2019 20:16
Copy link

@elizabethengelman elizabethengelman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! :shipit:

Just a small question about the urfave/cli version.

go.mod Outdated
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.0 // indirect
gopkg.in/natefinch/npipe.v2 v2.0.0-20160621034901-c1b8fa8bdcce // indirect
gopkg.in/urfave/cli.v1 v1.20.0 // indirect
gopkg.in/urfave/cli.v1 v1.22.1 // indirect

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not 100% sure about updating that pesky urfave/cli to 1.22.1 - in vdb I think we still have it as 1.20.0. I was previously seeing issues when using a more recent version than this, but perhaps that's changed?

@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ import (
mcdStorage "github.com/vulcanize/mcd_transformers/transformers/storage"
"github.com/vulcanize/mcd_transformers/transformers/storage/flip"
"github.com/vulcanize/mcd_transformers/transformers/storage/test_helpers"
"github.com/vulcanize/vulcanizedb/libraries/shared/storage"
storage2 "github.com/vulcanize/vulcanizedb/libraries/shared/factories/storage"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super small, but it looks like this could be storage (instead of storage2) since we're aliasing the other storage package to mcdStorage. Totally not merge blocking!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@rmulhol rmulhol merged commit 83a8ad5 into staging Oct 28, 2019
@rmulhol rmulhol deleted the vdb-929-move-shared-files-to-vdb branch October 28, 2019 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants